Thomson Tour Operations Ltd v Smith & Ors [1995] UKEAT 432_95_2505 (25 May 1995)

Thomson Tour Operations Ltd v Smith & Ors [1995] UKEAT 432_95_2505 (25 May 1995)

The Tribunal's decision to sever the claims and hear Mrs Smith and Mrs Wood's cases together, and Mr Hamilton's case separately, was a proper exercise of discretion. No irrelevant matters were considered, no relevant matters were excluded, and the decision was not perverse. The order aligned with the wishes of all applicants and promoted timely justice.

Citation
[1995] UKEAT 432_95_2505
Parties
Appellant: Thomson Tour Operations Ltd; Second Respondent: Mr Hamilton; Complainant: Mrs Smith; Complainant: Mrs Wood
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
25 May 1995
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal Against Case Management Order (consolidation/severance of Claims)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Case Management, Consolidation of Proceedings
Employment Law Discrimination Law Civil Procedure Redundancy Unfair Dismissal Race Discrimination Sex Discrimination Case Management +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thomson Tour Operations Ltd

Appellant

Mr Hamilton

Second Respondent

Mrs Smith

Complainant

Mrs Wood

Complainant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal Against Case Management Order (consolidation/severance of Claims)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in exercising its discretion to order separate hearings for Mr Hamilton and for Mrs Smith/Mrs Wood rather than consolidating all claims

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's decision to sever the claims and hear Mrs Smith and Mrs Wood's cases together, and Mr Hamilton's case separately, was a proper exercise of discretion. No irrelevant matters were considered, no relevant matters were excluded, and the decision was not perverse. The order aligned with the wishes of all applicants and promoted timely justice.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Order of the Industrial Tribunal affirmed; Mrs Smith and Mrs Wood's cases to be heard together, Mr Hamilton's case to be heard separately.