Mrs E Connor v Tots Bots Ltd (In Liquidation) (Scotland : Protective Award) [2024] UKET 4100136/2024 (10 December 2024)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to consult employees as required, entitling the claimant to a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2024] UKET 4100136/2024
Parties: Claimant: Mrs E Connor; Respondent: Tots Bots Ltd (In Liquidation)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 10 December 2024
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: claim upheld
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Failure to Consult

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Failure to Consult

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mrs E Connor

Claimant

Tots Bots Ltd (In Liquidation)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to consult employees as required under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 before collective redundancies
2 Entitlement of claimant to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to consult employees as required, entitling the claimant to a protective award.

Court Disposition

claim upheld

Orders

The claimant is awarded a protective award for the respondent's failure to consult.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.