Skyscanner Limited v Traveler Trolly (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18516 (21 March 2017)

Skyscanner Limited v Traveler Trolly (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18516 (21 March 2017)

The domain name was found to be identical or similar to the Complainant's mark, and there was no evidence of rights or legitimate interests by the Respondent. The registration was determined to be abusive.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] DRS 18516
Parties
Complainant: Skyscanner Limited; Respondent: Traveler Trolly
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Skyscanner Limited

Complainant

Traveler Trolly

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was registered in a manner which took unfair advantage of or was unfairly detrimental to the Complainant's Rights
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The domain name was found to be identical or similar to the Complainant's mark, and there was no evidence of rights or legitimate interests by the Respondent. The registration was determined to be abusive.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the Complainant