Mr K Celinski v Triple 9 Transport Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Race Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 2301359/2017 (15 September 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, subjected to race discrimination, suffered unlawful deduction from wages, and that the respondent breached the Working Time Regulations.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2301359/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr K Celinski; Respondent: Triple 9 Transport Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 15 September 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claims upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Race Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Breach of Contract Race Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr K Celinski

Claimant

Triple 9 Transport Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was race discrimination
3 Whether there was a breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, subjected to race discrimination, suffered unlawful deduction from wages, and that the respondent breached the Working Time Regulations.

Court Disposition

Claims upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal
Respondent to pay compensation for race discrimination

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.