Bowden & Ors v. Tuffnells Parcels Express Ltd [2000] UKEAT 622_99_0604 (6 April 2000)
The court found that, on a literal reading of Regulation 18 and Article 1(3) of Directive 93/104/EEC, all workers in the road transport sector of activity, including non-mobile clerical workers, are excluded from the entitlement to annual leave under Regulation 13. However, due to conflicting policy considerations, lack of clarity in the legislative intent, and the absence of authoritative guidance from the European Court of Justice, the court decided to stay the appeal and refer questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 622_99_0604
- Parties
- Appellants: Mrs Bowden, Mrs Chapman, Mrs Doyle; Respondent: Tuffnells Parcels Express Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal, Judgment Stayed Pending Reference to European Court of Justice
- Outcome
- Appeal stayed pending reference to the European Court of Justice
- Legal Topics
- Working Time Regulations, Annual Leave Entitlement, Sectoral Exclusions, Interpretation of Directives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Bowden, Mrs Chapman, Mrs Doyle
Appellants
Tuffnells Parcels Express Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal, Judgment Stayed Pending Reference to European Court of Justice
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clerical workers employed in the road transport sector are excluded from annual leave entitlement under Regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 by virtue of Regulation 18
- 2 Proper construction of 'sector of activity' in Regulation 18 and Article 1(3) of Directive 93/104/EEC
- 3 Whether non-mobile workers in the road transport sector are excluded from the Working Time Directive
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, on a literal reading of Regulation 18 and Article 1(3) of Directive 93/104/EEC, all workers in the road transport sector of activity, including non-mobile clerical workers, are excluded from the entitlement to annual leave under Regulation 13. However, due to conflicting policy considerations, lack of clarity in the legislative intent, and the absence of authoritative guidance from the European Court of Justice, the court decided to stay the appeal and refer questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.
Court Disposition
Appeal stayed pending reference to the European Court of Justice
Orders
- The appeal is not concluded; proceedings are stayed pending a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice on the interpretation of Article 1(3) of Directive 93/104/EEC and its application to non-mobile workers in the road transport sector.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment