Aslam & Ors v Uber BV & Ors (minimum wage : paid leave : whistle-blowing) [2016] UKET 2202551/2015 (28 October 2016)
Uber drivers are 'workers' within the meaning of UK employment legislation, entitled to minimum wage, paid leave, and whistle-blowing protections, based on the degree of control Uber exercises over drivers and the practical reality of their working relationship.
- Citation
- [2016] UKET 2202551/2015
- Parties
- Claimant: Yaseen Aslam; Respondent: Uber BV; Respondent: Uber London Ltd; Respondent: Uber Britannia Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Worker Status, Minimum Wage, Paid Leave, Whistle Blowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yaseen Aslam
Claimant
Uber BV
Respondent
Uber London Ltd
Respondent
Uber Britannia Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Uber drivers are 'workers' under UK employment law
- 2 Entitlement to minimum wage
- 3 Entitlement to paid leave
Ratio Decidendi
Uber drivers are 'workers' within the meaning of UK employment legislation, entitled to minimum wage, paid leave, and whistle-blowing protections, based on the degree of control Uber exercises over drivers and the practical reality of their working relationship.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Uber drivers classified as workers
- Entitled to minimum wage
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment