Miss E Dixon v UK Largest Laser Clinic: (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Written Pay Statement) [2017] UKET 2402883/2014 (8 June 2017)

The tribunal determined whether the respondent's actions constituted discrimination, unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction from wages based on the evidence and applicable statutory provisions.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2402883/2014
Parties: Claimant: Miss E Dixon; Respondent: UK Largest Laser Clinic
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 08 June 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Judgment for the claimant in part
Legal Topics: Age Discrimination, Breach of Contract, Disability Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Written Pay Statement

Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination Breach of Contract Disability Discrimination Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss E Dixon

Claimant

UK Largest Laser Clinic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination
2 Whether there was a breach of contract
3 Whether the claimant was subjected to disability discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant in part

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.