Scottish Power Energy Retail Limited v Umar Hayyat (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16820 (26 January 2016)

Scottish Power Energy Retail Limited v Umar Hayyat (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 16820 (26 January 2016)

The Panel found that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, that the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. Accordingly, the complaint succeeds.

Citation
[2016] DRS 16820
Parties
Complainant: Scottish Power Energy Retail Limited; Respondent: Umar Hayyat
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 January 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Scottish Power Energy Retail Limited

Complainant

Umar Hayyat

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, that the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. Accordingly, the complaint succeeds.

Court Disposition

complaint upheld

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.