Molnlycke Ltd v Hulatt [1996] UKEAT 485_95_2604 (26 April 1996)

Molnlycke Ltd v Hulatt [1996] UKEAT 485_95_2604 (26 April 1996)

The employer failed to provide the respondent with sufficient information about the allegations and evidence, breached principles of fairness and natural justice, and did not conduct a reasonable investigation; therefore, the dismissal was unfair.

Citation
[1996] UKEAT 485_95_2604
Parties
Employer: Appellants; Employee: Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 April 1996
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Natural Justice, Disciplinary Procedure
Employment Law Unfair Dismissal Natural Justice Disciplinary Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellants

Employer

Respondent

Employee

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the dismissal of the respondent unfair under employment law?
  2. 2 Did the employer breach principles of natural justice in the disciplinary process?
  3. 3 Did the employer follow its internal disciplinary code?

Ratio Decidendi

The employer failed to provide the respondent with sufficient information about the allegations and evidence, breached principles of fairness and natural justice, and did not conduct a reasonable investigation; therefore, the dismissal was unfair.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; finding of unfair dismissal upheld.