Morgan Stanley, Re [2005] DRS 2959 (8 November 2005)
The complainant established rights in the 'Morgan Stanley' mark, which is similar to the disputed domain name. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name constituted typosquatting, likely to confuse users and take unfair advantage of the complainant's rights. The respondent failed to rebut the presumption of abusive registration. Therefore, the domain name is an abusive registration and should be transferred to the complainant.
- Citation
- [2005] DRS 2959
- Parties
- Complainant: Morgan Stanley; Respondent: Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name to be transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks, Passing Off, Typosquatting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Morgan Stanley
Complainant
Unknown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the disputed domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the 'Morgan Stanley' mark, which is similar to the disputed domain name. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name constituted typosquatting, likely to confuse users and take unfair advantage of the complainant's rights. The respondent failed to rebut the presumption of abusive registration. Therefore, the domain name is an abusive registration and should be transferred to the complainant.
Court Disposition
Domain name to be transferred to complainant
Orders
- The domain name morganstaniey.co.uk is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment