Home Office v. Butt [2001] UKEAT 1169_00_1202 (12 February 2001)
The appeal is allowed to proceed to a full hearing as it lies on the borderline between error of law and differing views of fact, requiring further argument on the proper appellate approach.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1169_00_1202
- Parties
- Appellant: Unknown (Appellant); Respondent: Unknown (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing; Appeal Allowed to Proceed to Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Appeals on Points of Law, Employment Tribunal Procedure, Discrimination, Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unknown (Appellant)
Appellant
Unknown (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing; Appeal Allowed to Proceed to Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper approach to appellate review of Employment Tribunal decisions
- 2 Distinction between errors of law and findings of fact
- 3 Procedure for appeals involving discrimination claims
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is allowed to proceed to a full hearing as it lies on the borderline between error of law and differing views of fact, requiring further argument on the proper appellate approach.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing
Orders
- Liability appeal to be listed for 3 hours Category B
- Exchange of skeleton arguments at least 14 days before hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment