Chancerygate (Business Centre) Ltd v. Jenkins (Rev 1) [2010] UKEAT 0212_10_2204 (22 April 2010)
The Regional Employment Judge failed to balance the overriding objective by imposing a six-day hearing at short notice, causing unfairness to both parties who would lose their counsel and incur unnecessary costs, especially in the absence of proper disclosure. The joint application for postponement should have been granted.
- Citation
- [2010] UKEAT 0212_10_2204
- Parties
- Appellant: Unknown (Appellant); Respondent: Unknown (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal Against Case Management Order
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Postponement of Hearing, Case Management, Overriding Objective, Disclosure, Adjournment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unknown (Appellant)
Appellant
Unknown (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal Against Case Management Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Regional Employment Judge erred in refusing a joint application to postpone a hearing and in extending the hearing from two to six days without proper notice or consideration of fairness.
Ratio Decidendi
The Regional Employment Judge failed to balance the overriding objective by imposing a six-day hearing at short notice, causing unfairness to both parties who would lose their counsel and incur unnecessary costs, especially in the absence of proper disclosure. The joint application for postponement should have been granted.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Order for six-day hearing set aside
- Hearing postponed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment