Arrowsmith v. Nottingham Trent University [2010] UKEAT 1708_09_1207 (12 July 2010)
The Employment Tribunal did not err in law in refusing to vary its decision on review or in awarding costs against the Claimant; the new evidence would not have affected the outcome, and the Tribunal's findings were open to it on the evidence.
- Citation
- [2010] UKEAT 1708_09_1207
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: Ms D M Arrowsmith; Respondent: Unknown (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Rule 3(10) Application for Permission to Proceed With Appeal After Review Refusal and Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination, Pregnancy Discrimination, Employment Tribunal Review, Costs Orders, Appellate Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms D M Arrowsmith
Appellant/claimant
Unknown (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Rule 3(10) Application for Permission to Proceed With Appeal After Review Refusal and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in refusing to vary its decision on review
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in making a costs order against the Claimant
- 3 Whether new evidence or interests of justice warranted a review
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal did not err in law in refusing to vary its decision on review or in awarding costs against the Claimant; the new evidence would not have affected the outcome, and the Tribunal's findings were open to it on the evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Application under rule 3(10) dismissed.
- No further action to be taken on the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment