Williams v DHL Services Ltd (Jurisdictional Points : Extension of time: reasonably practicable) [2013] UKEAT 0107_13_1507 (15 July 2013)
It was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to submit his claim within the three-month period, as he had 11 weeks prior to illness and provided no explanation for not submitting during that time; appeal dismissed.
- Citation
- [2013] UKEAT 0107_13_1507
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mr B Williams; Respondent: Unknown (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Rule 3(10) Application
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Extension of Time, Reasonably Practicable, Procedural Strike Out
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr B Williams
Claimant/appellant
Unknown (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Rule 3(10) Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the unfair dismissal claim was presented within the statutory three-month time limit
- 2 Whether it was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to submit the claim within the time limit
Ratio Decidendi
It was reasonably practicable for the Claimant to submit his claim within the three-month period, as he had 11 weeks prior to illness and provided no explanation for not submitting during that time; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No interference with Employment Judge's decision
- No written reasons to be provided
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment