Amanresorts International Pte Ltd v Upendra Galegedera (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2010] DRS 9100 (10 December 2010)

Amanresorts International Pte Ltd v Upendra Galegedera (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2010] DRS 9100 (10 December 2010)

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name.

Citation
[2010] DRS 9100
Parties
Complainant: Amanresorts International Pte Ltd; Respondent: Upendra Galegedera
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 December 2010
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amanresorts International Pte Ltd

Complainant

Upendra Galegedera

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.