UAB "TELE2" v Vaidas Go (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17668 (02 September 2016)

UAB "TELE2" v Vaidas Go (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17668 (02 September 2016)

The panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered in bad faith.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17668
Parties
Complainant: UAB "TELE2"; Respondent: Vaidas Go
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
02 September 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Bad Faith Registration, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Domain Name Transfer Bad Faith Registration Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

UAB "TELE2"

Complainant

Vaidas Go

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was registered in bad faith
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered in bad faith.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.