Mr K McDermott v Vault & Vega Ltd: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 3200107/2017 (30 May 2017)

The Tribunal found that the respondent breached contract terms, made unlawful deductions from wages, failed to comply with Working Time Regulations, and did not provide required written statements.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 3200107/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr K McDermott; Respondent: Vault & Vega Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 30 May 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations, Written Statements

Employment Law Breach of Contract Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations Written Statements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr K McDermott

Claimant

Vault & Vega Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether there was a breach of contract
2 Whether there was an unlawful deduction from wages
3 Whether Working Time Regulations were breached

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the respondent breached contract terms, made unlawful deductions from wages, failed to comply with Working Time Regulations, and did not provide required written statements.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay claimant for unlawful deductions
Respondent to comply with Working Time Regulations

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.