Mr M Evans and Others v Venduct Engineering Ltd (In Administration) (England and Wales : Protective Award : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2601061/2016 (18 July 2017)
The respondent failed to consult with the claimants as required by law prior to their redundancies, entitling the claimants to a protective award and rendering the dismissals unfair.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2601061/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr M Evans and Others; Respondent: Venduct Engineering Ltd (In Administration)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claims upheld
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr M Evans and Others
Claimant
Venduct Engineering Ltd (In Administration)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to consult with employees as required before redundancies
- 2 Whether the claimants are entitled to a protective award for failure to consult
- 3 Whether the dismissals were unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to consult with the claimants as required by law prior to their redundancies, entitling the claimants to a protective award and rendering the dismissals unfair.
Court Disposition
Claims upheld
Orders
- Protective award granted to claimants
- Respondent found liable for unfair dismissal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment