Ms H Wroblewska v Viridor Waste Management Ltd: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 2301660/2016 (15 June 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered unlawful deduction from wages, but did not establish sufficient evidence for disability or sex discrimination.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2301660/2016
Parties: Claimant: Ms H Wroblewska; Respondent: Viridor Waste Management Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 15 June 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim partly upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Disability Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Employment Law Contract Law Equality Law Breach of Contract Disability Discrimination Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Ms H Wroblewska

Claimant

Viridor Waste Management Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether the claimant suffered disability discrimination
3 Whether the claimant suffered sex discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered unlawful deduction from wages, but did not establish sufficient evidence for disability or sex discrimination.

Court Disposition

Claim partly upheld

Orders

Compensation awarded for unfair dismissal
Order for repayment of unlawfully deducted wages

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.