Karnani v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 627 (TC) (23 September 2011)

Karnani v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 627 (TC) (23 September 2011)

The penalty of 30% was reasonable given the negligent preparation of returns, the incorrect gift aid claim, the late election, and the omission of income, compounded by subsequent amendments that worsened the position. No further abatement was justified.

Citation
[2011] UKFTT 627 (TC)
Parties
Appellant: Viswanath Karnani; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 September 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Penalties, Gift Aid, Negligence in Tax Returns
Tax Law Income Tax Corporation Tax Penalties Gift Aid Negligence in Tax Returns

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Viswanath Karnani

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the penalty determination under section 95(1)(a) TMA 1970 for the years 2000-01, 2003-04, and 2004-05 was excessive and should be reduced or increased.

Ratio Decidendi

The penalty of 30% was reasonable given the negligent preparation of returns, the incorrect gift aid claim, the late election, and the omission of income, compounded by subsequent amendments that worsened the position. No further abatement was justified.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Penalty of 30% (an abatement of 70%) to stand as determined by the Respondents following internal review.