Vodafone Group Services Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 701 (TC) (21 July 2014)

Vodafone Group Services Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 701 (TC) (21 July 2014)

A claim for repayment of overpaid VAT under section 80 VATA 1994, made within the statutory time limit and meeting formal requirements, may be justified by amended reasons after expiry of the time limit, provided the quantum is unchanged and the claim remains unresolved. The statutory focus is on the amount overpaid, not the original reason for the claim. Any other interpretation would result in an unjust windfall to HMRC and is contrary to the purpose of the legislation.

Citation
[2014] UKFTT 701
Parties
Appellant: Vodafone Group Services Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 July 2014
Procedural Posture
VAT Repayment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
VAT Repayment Claims, Time Limits, Amendment of Claim Reasons, Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vodafone Group Services Ltd

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

VAT Repayment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

  1. 1 Whether an appellant can amend the reasons for a VAT repayment claim after expiry of statutory time limits, provided the quantum remains unchanged
  2. 2 Whether such amendment constitutes a new claim out of time under section 80 VATA 1994

Ratio Decidendi

A claim for repayment of overpaid VAT under section 80 VATA 1994, made within the statutory time limit and meeting formal requirements, may be justified by amended reasons after expiry of the time limit, provided the quantum is unchanged and the claim remains unresolved. The statutory focus is on the amount overpaid, not the original reason for the claim. Any other interpretation would result in an unjust windfall to HMRC and is contrary to the purpose of the legislation.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Appellant's claim for repayment of £4,173,388.61 is upheld
  • HMRC to repay the appellant the amount of its 2007 voluntary disclosure