Miss E Richards v Vodafone Ltd and Others (Scotland : Age Discrimination : Disability Discrimination : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 4106119/2015 (29 March 2017)

Miss E Richards v Vodafone Ltd and Others (Scotland : Age Discrimination : Disability Discrimination : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 4106119/2015 (29 March 2017)

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which discrimination could be inferred and whether the respondent provided a non-discriminatory explanation. The tribunal also considered whether the dismissal was fair and whether statutory rights regarding wages and working time were breached.

Citation
[2017] UKET 4106119/2015
Parties
Claimant: Miss E Richards; Respondent: Vodafone Ltd and Others
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Partially upheld
Legal Topics
Age Discrimination, Disability Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations
Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination Disability Discrimination Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miss E Richards

Claimant

Vodafone Ltd and Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to disability discrimination
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was subjected to sex discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which discrimination could be inferred and whether the respondent provided a non-discriminatory explanation. The tribunal also considered whether the dismissal was fair and whether statutory rights regarding wages and working time were breached.

Court Disposition

Partially upheld