Pearson v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Penalty) [2018] UKFTT 358 (TC) (28 June 2018)
The Tribunal found that Mr Pearson, a young and inexperienced taxpayer, reasonably relied on the advice of a recommended and apparently competent accountant, and that this reliance constituted a reasonable excuse for the late filing. The penalties were therefore cancelled.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 358 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Warren Pearson; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax/corporation Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Self Assessment, Penalties, Reasonable Excuse, Reliance on Professional Advice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Warren Pearson
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax/corporation Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether penalties for late filing of tax returns for 2013/14 and 2014/15 should be upheld
- 2 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for non-filing
- 3 Whether reliance on an accountant constitutes a reasonable excuse
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that Mr Pearson, a young and inexperienced taxpayer, reasonably relied on the advice of a recommended and apparently competent accountant, and that this reliance constituted a reasonable excuse for the late filing. The penalties were therefore cancelled.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- All penalties for late filing of tax returns for 2013/14 and 2014/15 are cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment