Lanarkshire County Council v. Coatbridge Magistrates [1910] UKHL 508 (08 April 1910)
It is not a defence under the Rivers Pollution Prevention Act 1876 to claim that a stream is so polluted as to be a sewer; the Act's purpose is to prevent streams from being turned into sewers, and the appellants have not shown they fall within any statutory exceptions.
- Citation
- [1910] UKHL 508
- Parties
- Petitioner/respondent: Lanarkshire County Council; Respondent/appellant: Coatbridge Magistrates
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / House of Lords Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Water Pollution, Statutory Interpretation, Public Health, Local Government Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lanarkshire County Council
Petitioner/respondent
Coatbridge Magistrates
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / House of Lords Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is a valid defence under the Rivers Pollution Prevention Act 1876 to claim that a stream is so polluted as to be a sewer, making it not an offence to discharge sewage into it.
- 2 Whether the exceptions or excuses in the Act apply to the appellants' conduct.
Ratio Decidendi
It is not a defence under the Rivers Pollution Prevention Act 1876 to claim that a stream is so polluted as to be a sewer; the Act's purpose is to prevent streams from being turned into sewers, and the appellants have not shown they fall within any statutory exceptions.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs/expenses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment