Mr M Greenwood v Watkin Jones & Son Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Health & Safety : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 4100419/2017 (5 October 2017)

Mr M Greenwood v Watkin Jones & Son Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Health & Safety : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 4100419/2017 (5 October 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered unlawful deductions from wages, with breaches of contract and working time regulations established. Protected disclosures were made and the claimant was subjected to detriment as a result.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] UKET 4100419/2017
Parties
Claimant: Mr M Greenwood; Respondent: Watkin Jones & Son Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 October 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Health & Safety, Public Interest Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations
Employment Law Breach of Contract Health & Safety Public Interest Disclosure Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr M Greenwood

Claimant

Watkin Jones & Son Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether there was a breach of contract
  3. 3 Whether there was an unlawful deduction from wages

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered unlawful deductions from wages, with breaches of contract and working time regulations established. Protected disclosures were made and the claimant was subjected to detriment as a result.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

  • Compensation awarded to claimant
  • Respondent ordered to pay outstanding wages