Accor v Webdreams Llc (Full Decision _Cancellation) [2012] DRS 11901 (15 November 2012)
The panel found that the complainant had established rights in the mark, that the respondent had no legitimate interests, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Therefore, the complaint succeeded.
- Citation
- [2012] DRS 11901
- Parties
- Complainant: Accor; Respondent: Webdreams Llc
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement, Passing Off
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Accor
Complainant
Webdreams Llc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name has been registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the complainant had established rights in the mark, that the respondent had no legitimate interests, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Therefore, the complaint succeeded.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment