Corporate Innovations v White Eagle ( Europe ) Plc [2010] DRS 8387 (21 June 2010)

Corporate Innovations v White Eagle ( Europe ) Plc [2010] DRS 8387 (21 June 2010)

The Complainant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the domain name freedom-card.co.uk is an Abusive Registration in the hands of the Respondent. The evidence showed the Respondent made demonstrable preparations to use the domain name in connection with a genuine offering of services before being aware of the Complainant's rights or cause for complaint. There was no evidence the Respondent registered or used the domain name to take unfair advantage of or be unfairly detrimental to the Complainant's rights.

Citation
[2010] DRS 8387
Parties
Complainant: Corporate Innovations; Respondent: White Eagle (Europe) Plc
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Trade Marks, Passing Off, Abusive Registration, Domain Name Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Corporate Innovations

Complainant

White Eagle (Europe) Plc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name freedom-card.co.uk is an Abusive Registration in the hands of the Respondent under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the Complainant has prior and superior rights to the term FREEDOMCARD or similar marks
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent's use or registration of the domain name took unfair advantage of or was unfairly detrimental to the Complainant's rights

Ratio Decidendi

The Complainant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the domain name freedom-card.co.uk is an Abusive Registration in the hands of the Respondent. The evidence showed the Respondent made demonstrable preparations to use the domain name in connection with a genuine offering of services before being aware of the Complainant's rights or cause for complaint. There was no evidence the Respondent registered or used the domain name to take unfair advantage of or be unfairly detrimental to the Complainant's rights.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action to be taken in respect of the domain name freedom-card.co.uk