Arnold Clark Automobiles Limited v Whois Foundation (Full Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 19925 (05 April 2018)
The complainant established rights in the name and mark, the domain name was found to be identical or similar, and the respondent's registration was abusive due to lack of legitimate interest and no response.
- Citation
- [2018] DRS 19925
- Parties
- Complainant: Arnold Clark Automobiles Limited; Respondent: Whois Foundation
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer of domain name ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Arnold Clark Automobiles Limited
Complainant
Whois Foundation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the respondent's registration or use of the domain name is abusive
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the name and mark, the domain name was found to be identical or similar, and the respondent's registration was abusive due to lack of legitimate interest and no response.
Court Disposition
Transfer of domain name ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment