Mr C Stevenson v Wicker Tyres (UTE) Ltd (England and Wales : Contract of Employment) [2024] UKET 1800859/2024 (28 May 2024)

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] United Kingdom Employment Tribunal You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Tribunal >> Mr C Stevenson v Wicker Tyres (UTE) Ltd (England and Wales : Contract of Employment) [2024] UKET 1800859/2024...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2024] UKET 1800859/2024
Parties: Claimant: Mr C Stevenson; Respondent: Wicker Tyres (UTE) Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 28 May 2024
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Topics: Contract of Employment

Employment Law Contract of Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

Mr C Stevenson

Claimant

Wicker Tyres (UTE) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether Mr C Stevenson was employed under a contract of employment by Wicker Tyres (UTE) Ltd

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.