Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. v William Brown (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19088 (11 August 2017)
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2017] DRS 19088
- Parties
- Complainant: Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.; Respondent: William Brown
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.
Complainant
William Brown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
- 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment