Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. v William Brown (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19088 (11 August 2017)

Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. v William Brown (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19088 (11 August 2017)

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2017] DRS 19088
Parties
Complainant: Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.; Respondent: William Brown
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
11 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Warner/Chappell Music, Inc.

Complainant

William Brown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.