HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG v Williams Tyisha (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16777 (17 December 2015)

HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG v Williams Tyisha (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16777 (17 December 2015)

The panel found that the complainant had established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Citation
[2015] DRS 16777
Parties
Complainant: HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG; Respondent: Williams Tyisha
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
17 December 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Trade Mark Infringement, Domain Name Transfer
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Trade Mark Infringement Domain Name Transfer

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HUGO BOSS Trade Mark Management GmbH & Co. KG

Complainant

Williams Tyisha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a trade mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of the disputed domain name to the complainant