Roadwise Sunderland v Yang Shengquan (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21317 (03 June 2019)
The complainant established rights in the name and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer of the domain name.
- Citation
- [2019] DRS 21317
- Parties
- Complainant: Roadwise Sunderland; Respondent: Yang Shengquan
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Roadwise Sunderland
Complainant
Yang Shengquan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the registration of the domain name is abusive
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the name and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the disputed domain name to Roadwise Sunderland
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment