Lincoln Bain and another (Appellants) v Zinnia Rolle (Respondent) (The Bahamas)
The appeal was struck out because the grounds advanced either challenged concurrent findings of fact, contrary to settled practice, or sought to introduce new arguments not raised in the courts below, which is not permitted except in exceptional circumstances.
- Citation
- [2025] UKPC 49
- Parties
- Appellants: Lincoln Bain and another; Respondent: Zinnia Rolle
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Case Management Hearing on Leave to Appeal to Privy Council
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out
- Legal Topics
- Concurrent Findings of Fact, Appellate Practice, Interest Calculation, Introduction of New Issues on Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lincoln Bain and another
Appellants
Zinnia Rolle
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Case Management Hearing on Leave to Appeal to Privy Council
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Privy Council should entertain an appeal contrary to its settled practice on concurrent findings of fact
- 2 Whether delay in judgment delivery rendered the findings unsafe
- 3 Whether a new argument on interest calculation can be raised for the first time before the Privy Council
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was struck out because the grounds advanced either challenged concurrent findings of fact, contrary to settled practice, or sought to introduce new arguments not raised in the courts below, which is not permitted except in exceptional circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out
Orders
- Appeal struck out at case management stage without proceeding to full hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment