Baker & Daniels LLP Faegre & Benson LLP v Zuo Pan (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 10537 (11 January 2012)
The Panel found that the complainants had rights in the names and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.
- Citation
- [2012] DRS 10537
- Parties
- Complainant: Baker & Daniels LLP; Complainant: Faegre & Benson LLP; Respondent: Zuo Pan
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- domain name transferred
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Baker & Daniels LLP
Complainant
Faegre & Benson LLP
Complainant
Zuo Pan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive
- 2 Whether the complainants have rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the complainants had rights in the names and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
domain name transferred
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment