In Re AIR CARGO SHIPPING SERVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
The term "air carrier" in 49 U.S.C. §41713(b)(1) encompasses foreign as well as domestic air carriers; legislative history, the IATCA, the Sunset Act, the purpose of deregulation, and canons favoring uniform national regulation compel reading the preemption provision to bar state-law claims against foreign carriers,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 697 F.3d 154; 2012 WL 4820732; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 21091
- Parties
- Appellants: Plaintiffs (indirect purchasers of air freight shipping services); Defendants Appellees: Numerous foreign airlines (defendants-appellees)
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2012
- Case Number
- Docket 11-5464-cv
- Procedural Posture
- Antitrust Civil Appeal (class/consumer Claims) / Appeal From District Court Order Dismissing State Law Claims as Expressly Preempted; Partial Final Judgment Under Rule 54(b) Appealed
- Outcome
- Affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Express Preemption, Foreign Air Carriers, Price Fixing Conspiracy, Statutory Interpretation, Legislative History
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs (indirect purchasers of air freight shipping services)
Appellants
Numerous foreign airlines (defendants-appellees)
Defendants Appellees
Procedural Posture
Antitrust Civil Appeal (class/consumer Claims) / Appeal From District Court Order Dismissing State Law Claims as Expressly Preempted; Partial Final Judgment Under Rule 54(b) Appealed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 49 U.S.C. § 41713(b)(1) preempts state-law antitrust, consumer protection, and unfair competition claims brought against foreign air carriers
Ratio Decidendi
The term "air carrier" in 49 U.S.C. §41713(b)(1) encompasses foreign as well as domestic air carriers; legislative history, the IATCA, the Sunset Act, the purpose of deregulation, and canons favoring uniform national regulation compel reading the preemption provision to bar state-law claims against foreign carriers, so plaintiffs' state-law claims are expressly preempted.
Court Disposition
Affirmed
Orders
- Affirmed district court dismissal of plaintiffs' state-law antitrust, consumer protection, and unfair competition claims as expressly preempted by 49 U.S.C. § 41713(b)(1)
- Partial final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) permitting immediate appeal is upheld; direct-purchaser claims remain in district court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment