Magdalena Sanchez McMordie, in Her Capacity as Beneficiary and Co- Trustee of the Hobart B. McMordie, II Asset Management Trust. v. Charles Harris McMordie, in His Capacity as Co-Trustee of the Hobart B. McMordie, II Asset Management Trust
Because the request was supported by counsel scheduling conflicts, was asserted to be sought in the interest of justice rather than for delay, and was unopposed by the opposing party, the court granted a 20-day extension to file the motion for rehearing to August 28, 2015.
- Citation
- Magdalena Sanchez McMordie, in Her Capacity as Beneficiary and Co- Trustee of the Hobart B. McMordie, II Asset Management Trust. v. Charles Harris McMordie, in His Capacity as Co-Trustee of the Hobart B. McMordie, II Asset Management Trust
- Parties
- Appellant/cross Appellee Beneficiary and Co Trustee of the Hobart B. Mc Mordie, II Asset Management Trust: Magdalena McMordie; Appellee/cross Appellant Co Trustee of the Hobart B. Mc Mordie, II Asset Management Trust: Charles Harris McMordie
- Court
- Texas Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2015
- Case Number
- 07-14-00393-CV
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Appellate Stage — Motion for Extension to File Motion for Rehearing
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted until August 28, 2015 to file motion for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Motion for Rehearing, Trust Administration, Co Trustee Dispute
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Magdalena McMordie
Appellant/cross Appellee Beneficiary and Co Trustee of the Hobart B. Mc Mordie, II Asset Management Trust
Charles Harris McMordie
Appellee/cross Appellant Co Trustee of the Hobart B. Mc Mordie, II Asset Management Trust
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Appellate Stage — Motion for Extension to File Motion for Rehearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a 20-day extension to file a motion for rehearing based on counsel scheduling conflicts and consent of opposing counsel
- 2 Whether the requested extension is sought in the interest of justice and not for delay
Ratio Decidendi
Because the request was supported by counsel scheduling conflicts, was asserted to be sought in the interest of justice rather than for delay, and was unopposed by the opposing party, the court granted a 20-day extension to file the motion for rehearing to August 28, 2015.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted until August 28, 2015 to file motion for rehearing.
Orders
- Grant 20-day extension to file motion for rehearing; new deadline August 28, 2015
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment