FINGER LAKES CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Below, Appellant, v. HONEOYE LAKE ACQUISITION, LLC, and Lyrical Opportunity Partners, L.P., Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs Below, Appellees
The Court affirmed that the operating agreement did not supersede the overarching term sheet and clawback agreement and affirmed the Court of Chancery’s application of the clawback and its limitation of indemnification to expenses incurred before the partial judgment on the pleadings, but reversed the Court of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 151 A.3d 450; 2016 WL 6678445; 2016 Del. LEXIS 601
- Parties
- Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Below; Appellant: Finger Lakes Capital Partners, LLC; Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Below; Appellee: Honeoye Lake Acquisition, LLC; Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Below; Appellee: Lyrical Opportunity Partners, L.P.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Delaware
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2016
- Case Number
- 42, 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Court of Chancery / Post Trial Appeal; Review of Court of Chancery Final Judgment and Remedial Orders
- Outcome
- Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded
- Legal Topics
- Operating Agreements, Term Sheet, Clawback Agreement, Setoff, Recoupment, Statute of Limitations, Indemnification, Limited Liability Companies, Appeal and Standards of Review
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Finger Lakes Capital Partners, LLC
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Below; Appellant
Honeoye Lake Acquisition, LLC
Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Below; Appellee
Lyrical Opportunity Partners, L.P.
Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Below; Appellee
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Court of Chancery / Post Trial Appeal; Review of Court of Chancery Final Judgment and Remedial Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a portfolio company operating agreement supersedes an overarching term sheet and clawback agreement
- 2 Whether the Court of Chancery correctly applied the clawback agreement to reallocate distributions
- 3 Whether appellees may recover time-barred management fees by setoff or recoupment
Ratio Decidendi
The Court affirmed that the operating agreement did not supersede the overarching term sheet and clawback agreement and affirmed the Court of Chancery’s application of the clawback and its limitation of indemnification to expenses incurred before the partial judgment on the pleadings, but reversed the Court of Chancery’s allowance of time-barred management fees by setoff or recoupment because 10 Del. C. § 8120 bars setoff for time-barred debts and recoupment was unavailable absent a tight transactional nexus between the claims.
Court Disposition
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded
Orders
- Affirm Court of Chancery’s holdings except as to use of setoff/recoupment for time-barred fees
- Reverse the judgment to the extent it allowed Lyrical to recover earlier management fees by setoff or recoupment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment