In THE MATTER OF TRUST a AND TRUST C. ESTABLISHED UNDER THE BERNARD L. AND JEANNETTE FENENBOCK LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT, DATED MARCH 12, 2008 v. the State of Texas

In THE MATTER OF TRUST a AND TRUST C. ESTABLISHED UNDER THE BERNARD L. AND JEANNETTE FENENBOCK LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT, DATED MARCH 12, 2008 v. the State of Texas

The probate court had jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute between the joined parties despite the absence of the buyers, but the probate court erred in ordering restoration of the shares to the Sub-Trusts and imposing a constructive trust against Glenna because she no longer owned or controlled the shares and a constructive trust requires identifiable property or traceable proceeds in the defendant's possession; appropriate relief against Glenna is limited to money judgment or constructive trust on traceable proceeds or relief against the actual owners if they are joined.

Citation
In THE MATTER OF TRUST a AND TRUST C. ESTABLISHED UNDER THE BERNARD L. AND JEANNETTE FENENBOCK LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT, DATED MARCH 12, 2008 v. the State of Texas
Parties
Plaintiff/co Trustee: Mark Fenenbock; Defendant/co Trustee: Glenna Fenenbock Gaddy; Non Party Buyer: Weston Gaddy; Non Party Buyer: Lane Gaddy
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
United States
Judgment Date
10 May 2024
Case Number
22-0674
Procedural Posture
Probate/trust Dispute / Petition for Review to the Supreme Court of Texas
Outcome
Reverse the court of appeals judgment vacating the probate court's order; reverse the probate court's order; remand to the probate court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion
Legal Topics
Breach of Trust, Constructive Trust, Joinder of Parties, Jurisdiction, Injunctive Relief, Valuation, Remedies
Source Language
English
Trusts Probate Civil Procedure Equitable Remedies Breach of Trust Constructive Trust Joinder of Parties Jurisdiction +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mark Fenenbock

Plaintiff/co Trustee

Glenna Fenenbock Gaddy

Defendant/co Trustee

Weston Gaddy

Non Party Buyer

Lane Gaddy

Non Party Buyer

Procedural Posture

Probate/trust Dispute / Petition for Review to the Supreme Court of Texas

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether absence of buyers (Weston and Lane) deprived the probate court of jurisdiction or required joinder under Rule 39
  2. 2 Whether Glenna breached fiduciary duties by acting unilaterally as co-trustee when she transferred and sold trust shares
  3. 3 Whether a constructive trust or order restoring shares may be imposed when the trustee no longer owns or controls the property

Ratio Decidendi

The probate court had jurisdiction to adjudicate the dispute between the joined parties despite the absence of the buyers, but the probate court erred in ordering restoration of the shares to the Sub-Trusts and imposing a constructive trust against Glenna because she no longer owned or controlled the shares and a constructive trust requires identifiable property or traceable proceeds in the defendant's possession; appropriate relief against Glenna is limited to money judgment or constructive trust on traceable proceeds or relief against the actual owners if they are joined.

Court Disposition

Reverse the court of appeals judgment vacating the probate court's order; reverse the probate court's order; remand to the probate court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion

Orders

  • Reverse the court of appeals judgment vacating the probate court’s order.
  • Reverse the probate court’s order.