Alpert v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC
The filed rate doctrine applies to intermediaries (e.g., mortgage servicers and brokers) when awarding damages against those intermediaries would squarely attack or require reevaluation of agency-approved filed rates; therefore suits against nonfiling intermediaries are barred to the same extent as suits against rate-filers when the relief would directly undermine the filed rate.
- Citation
- 494 P.3d 419
- Parties
- Plaintiff Appellant: Spencer Alpert; Defendant Appellee (mortgage Servicer): Nationstar Mortgage, LLC; Defendant Appellee (broker/subsidiary): Harwood Service Company; Defendant (insurer): American Security Insurance Company; Defendant (insurer): Standard Guaranty Insurance Company; Defendant (insurer): Assurant, Inc.
- Court
- Washington Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- United States
- Judgment Date
- 2 September 2021
- Case Number
- 99377-7
- Procedural Posture
- Certified Questions From United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit / Answering Certified Questions Before Washington Supreme Court
- Outcome
- First certified question answered in the affirmative: the filed rate doctrine can bar claims against intermediaries where awarding damages would squarely attack the filed rate. The court declines to answer the second certified question and directs the Ninth Circuit to revisit and apply McCarthy to the specific...
- Legal Topics
- Filed Rate Doctrine, Force Placed (lender Placed) Insurance, Kickback/rebate Allegations, Agency Rate Approval, Damages Limitation, Primary Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Spencer Alpert
Plaintiff Appellant
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Defendant Appellee (mortgage Servicer)
Harwood Service Company
Defendant Appellee (broker/subsidiary)
American Security Insurance Company
Defendant (insurer)
Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
Defendant (insurer)
Assurant, Inc.
Defendant (insurer)
Procedural Posture
Certified Questions From United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit / Answering Certified Questions Before Washington Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the filed rate doctrine bars suit against intermediaries (mortgage servicer and broker) who did not file insurance rates
- 2 Whether the damages requested fall outside the filed rate doctrine or directly attack agency-approved rates under McCarthy
Ratio Decidendi
The filed rate doctrine applies to intermediaries (e.g., mortgage servicers and brokers) when awarding damages against those intermediaries would squarely attack or require reevaluation of agency-approved filed rates; therefore suits against nonfiling intermediaries are barred to the same extent as suits against rate-filers when the relief would directly undermine the filed rate.
Court Disposition
First certified question answered in the affirmative: the filed rate doctrine can bar claims against intermediaries where awarding damages would squarely attack the filed rate. The court declines to answer the second certified question and directs the Ninth Circuit to revisit and apply McCarthy to the specific...
Orders
- Filed rate doctrine applies to intermediaries when damages would directly attack agency-approved rates
- Decline to answer second certified question; remand to Ninth Circuit to revisit and apply McCarthy v. Premera to plaintiff's damages allegations
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment