Stone Enock Mutambo v Agness Mhango and Anor (Appeal No. 22 of 1989) [1990] ZMSC 21 (13 September 1990)

Stone Enock Mutambo v Agness Mhango and Anor (Appeal No. 22 of 1989) [1990] ZMSC 21 (13 September 1990)

The claim for damages for wrongful eviction disclosed by the writ had never been tried before and could not be the subject of res judicata. The previous action determined only the issue of ownership, not the claim for wrongful eviction.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1990] ZMSC 21
Parties
Appellant: Appellant (name not specified); First Respondent: First Respondent (former wife, name not specified); Second Respondent: Second Respondent (on behalf of members of the Zambia Police Force, name not specified)
Court
Supreme Court of Zambia
Jurisdiction
Zambia
Case Number
Appeal No. 22 of 1989
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Ruling
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Co Ownership, Wrongful Eviction, Trespass to Personal Property
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Property Law Res Judicata Co Ownership Wrongful Eviction Trespass to Personal Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Appellant (name not specified)

Appellant

First Respondent (former wife, name not specified)

First Respondent

Second Respondent (on behalf of members of the Zambia Police Force, name not specified)

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the action was barred by res judicata
  2. 2 Whether the appellant could claim damages for wrongful eviction against the co-owner

Ratio Decidendi

The claim for damages for wrongful eviction disclosed by the writ had never been tried before and could not be the subject of res judicata. The previous action determined only the issue of ownership, not the claim for wrongful eviction.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Determination that the issues were res judicata is set aside.
  • Matter remitted below for the action to continue at an early date.