Bernard Chibuye v Zambia Sugar Company PLC (Appeal 41 of 2002) [2003] ZMSC 20 (4 June 2003)
The application for assessment of damages was an abuse of court process since the parties had already settled the matter out of court and payment had been made.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] ZMSC 20
- Parties
- Appellant: Bernard Chibuye; Respondent: Zambia Sugar Company PLC
- Court
- Supreme Court of Zambia
- Jurisdiction
- Zambia
- Case Number
- Appeal 41 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment After Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Out of Court Settlement, Abuse of Court Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernard Chibuye
Appellant
Zambia Sugar Company PLC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment After Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for assessment of damages was proper after an out-of-court settlement had been reached and payment made
Ratio Decidendi
The application for assessment of damages was an abuse of court process since the parties had already settled the matter out of court and payment had been made.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- application for assessment of damages dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
wawa IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ZAMBIA HOLDEN AT NDOLA (CIVIL JURISDICTION) APPEAL NO. 41/2002 BETWEEN: BERNARD CHIBUYE APPELLANT AND ZAMBIA SUGAR COMPANY PLC RESPONDENT CORAM: LEWANIKA, DCL, CH1BESAKUNDA, MAMBILIMA HS On 4th June, 20074and 4th June 2003 For the Appellant: (cid:9) For the Respondent: Mrs. I. M. KUNDA of George Kunda & Co. No Appearance JUDGMENT LEWANIKA, DCJ, delivered the judgment of the court. When we heard this appeal we dismissed it and said we would give our reasons later and we now do so. This appeal arose out of an application by the Appellant to the District Registrar for assessment of damages following upon a judgment by a Judge of the High Court delivered on rd October, 1998. At the hearing of the assessment of damages the parties relied on the affidavits which they had filed. Upon perusal of the affidavits the District Registrar discovered that after the delivery of the judgment the Appellant's advocates and the Respondent's advocates had entered into negotiations to settle the amount due to the Appellant out of court. Following these negotiations which were successfully concluded the Respondent's advocates paid to the Appellant's advocates on record the sum of K4,182,928.47 on 28'h September, 2000 in full and falai settlement of his claims and a further sum of IC900,000.00 for costs. The District Registrar dismissed the application for assessment with costs. To be charitable to the Appellant's advocates, we would like to assume that at the time when they applied for assessment of damages, they were not aware that the parties herein had settled the matter out of court, otherwise their application for assessment of damages was an abuse of court process. It was for this reason that we dismissed the appeal. D. M. DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE L. P. thibesakunda SUPREME COURT JUDGE I. M. C. Manabilima SUPREME COURT JUDGE 2