Charles Mukinkila Chitengi v Attorney General (SCZ APPEAL NO. 41/1995) [1997] ZMSC 63 (7 February 1997)

Charles Mukinkila Chitengi v Attorney General (SCZ APPEAL NO. 41/1995) [1997] ZMSC 63 (7 February 1997)

The appellant failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that he was a Zambian citizen by descent. The evidence presented by the appellant was inconsistent and contradicted by credible testimony from the respondent's witnesses, including relatives and local chiefs. Therefore, the Minister of Home Affairs was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] ZMSC 63
Parties
Appellant: Charles Mukinkila Chitenoi; Respondent: The Attorney-General
Court
Supreme Court of Zambia
Jurisdiction
Zambia
Case Number
SCZ APPEAL NO. 41/1995
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Deportation, Citizenship, Burden of Proof
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Constitutional Law Deportation Citizenship Burden of Proof

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Mukinkila Chitenoi

Appellant

The Attorney-General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal From High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is a Zambian citizen and therefore not subject to deportation under Section 26(2) of the Immigration and Deportation Act, Cap. 122
  2. 2 Whether the Minister of Home Affairs acted lawfully in issuing a deportation order against the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that he was a Zambian citizen by descent. The evidence presented by the appellant was inconsistent and contradicted by credible testimony from the respondent's witnesses, including relatives and local chiefs. Therefore, the Minister of Home Affairs was entitled to issue a deportation order under Section 26(2) of the Immigration and Deportation Act.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs to be taxed if not agreed.
  • The appellant remains subject to deportation under Section 26(2) of the Immigration and Deportation Act.