Christopher Mwanza and Anor v People (Appeal No. 79/90) [1990] ZMSC 19 (14 August 1990)
There was insufficient evidence to connect the appellants to aggravated robbery; recent possession alone was not enough. Convictions for aggravated robbery were quashed and substituted with convictions for receiving stolen property.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1990] ZMSC 19
- Parties
- Appellant: Christopher Mwanza; Appellant: Chinyama Saluwewe; Respondent: The People
- Court
- Supreme Court of Zambia
- Jurisdiction
- Zambia
- Case Number
- Appeal No. 79/90
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- convictions for aggravated robbery quashed; convictions for receiving stolen property substituted
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Robbery, Receiving Stolen Property, Appeal Against Conviction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Mwanza
Appellant
Chinyama Saluwewe
Appellant
The People
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence supported convictions for aggravated robbery
- 2 Whether convictions should be substituted for receiving stolen property
Ratio Decidendi
There was insufficient evidence to connect the appellants to aggravated robbery; recent possession alone was not enough. Convictions for aggravated robbery were quashed and substituted with convictions for receiving stolen property.
Court Disposition
convictions for aggravated robbery quashed; convictions for receiving stolen property substituted
Orders
- sentenced to five years imprisonment with hard labour effective from 14th April 1987
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
., .. I IN THE SUPREME. COURT OF ZAMBIA HOLDEN AT KABWE Appeal No. 79/90 (Criminal JurisdtctJon) I ., ., C~RISTOPHE~ MWANZA CHINYAMA SALUWEWE .. . ' V THE PEOPLE. CORAM: Gardner. AJ.s •• Chiila and Lawrence, JJ.~~. Appellant Respondent ,,. ' 14th August, 19~0 • .. . . . . Appellants appeared in per~on. . Mr. E. Sewanyana, State Advocate for the State. ' I • J u D G M. E N 1· I Gardner, AJ.s., d~Uvered the Judgment' of th~ court~. The app0ellants were convicted ·of aggravated robbery. The particulars of the offence were that they, together-with another a juvenile, on the 6th of Ma~rch, .1987, at -Lus4ka, stole a Quantity_ of personal property and at the tim~ of such stealing_ did use or threaten to use violence to Eshiudi Mungondo the· owner of that · property. . . . . The Senior State Aqvocate has very properly said that he I • • • • does not support that conviction and both the appellants have agreed to accept convictions for receiving stolen property. The,facts of the case were that.there was a break-in at-the· house of the complaincint by a number of p~ople and subsequently there was evidence that these appellants and __ their co-accused sold some of the stolen property to various people some of whom were witnesses. . . ' . . ' On thls evidence they were convicted of aggravate·d robbery. There was in fact no other evidence to connect them with.aggravated robbery and it therefore could not be said th.at the recent IX)SSeSSicn \ J I J I ·- I • • -. :. of the property could lead only to the . ~nfer.ence _that· .t~ey were guilty ·of the aggravated robbery. We therefore agree wt'th the learned State A~vocate in the very ~roper course which he has taken, a_nd th~·· ~ppeai:~ ~gain$t· conv l ction for aggravated robbery are· allowed·. The · convictions' are quashed and the sentences for that offence ·.are set aside. place we sub$tltute convictfons 1>f both :appeHants.· for receiving · stolen property· and we .sentence --~hem to .five years imprisonment: with hard labour with e-ffect ·from the 1_4t~ of.' April~- 1987 • In their · .. ............... . B. T. Gardner ACTING SUPREME COURT JUDGE ••••••••••••••• M,. s. Chdla SUPREME COURT JUDGE ·:, . . . ...... ···~-~-~-----":" A. · R. Lawrence SUPREME COURT . JUDGE· ' i I .1 , .