Director of Public Prosecutions v Peter Lloyd Mwape (Appeal No. 12 of 1987) [1987] ZMSC 100 (12 July 1987)
There was sufficient evidence to justify the conviction of the respondent for aggravated robbery with a firearm, based on identification by the complainant, recent possession of the stolen vehicle, and medical evidence of gunshot wounds, even though the actual weapon was not produced.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1987] ZMSC 100
- Parties
- Appellant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Cosmas Kazimoto
- Court
- Supreme Court of Zambia
- Jurisdiction
- Zambia
- Case Number
- Appeal No. 12 of 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal by Director of Public Prosecutions allowed; cross-appeal by respondent dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Robbery, Identification Evidence, Recent Possession, Firearm Use in Robbery
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Appellant
Cosmas Kazimoto
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence supported a conviction for aggravated robbery involving use of a firearm
- 2 Whether identification evidence and recent possession were sufficient to link the respondent to the offence
- 3 Whether the absence of the actual weapon used in the shooting was fatal to the prosecution's case
Ratio Decidendi
There was sufficient evidence to justify the conviction of the respondent for aggravated robbery with a firearm, based on identification by the complainant, recent possession of the stolen vehicle, and medical evidence of gunshot wounds, even though the actual weapon was not produced.
Court Disposition
Appeal by Director of Public Prosecutions allowed; cross-appeal by respondent dismissed.
Orders
- Conviction for aggravated robbery with a firearm restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
, . .oJ; IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ZAMBIA, ,;tf:'dii\g such prcpsrty <l!.d U!le or. Appeal No. 12 of 1987 .. · 'i i . ~ar.~per, '. . J. s .• ' del,1 v,re<1,:;th11, J.~~Q,,l\i19frh~9U.~!i !l 1'i ci) th.:~ :~.h#,I},fil'l _t.i1~t. ·!-''. i'!-,' 'J''W'i _;.;1·1 fl. ,..,.11·;" 11@<l r'>,,:,~n 'i.i~ /'_~.,) ·y,.,:· ·•~· 1!J~f~~-. -'.:i':·r~·-~· .:'.,,i-';,( \,' i:. ,-., ~,,,.,,.;lh. ,. •. < ; ' j ... ;This appeal,,: invc,lvi.ng ;th~,, c~;~~ o_f,,J>~~!!\'.', !,;I,01,t~ape_,,,.is;;~Y:;c,·:~c1 · r" (•'I 1 ·f i-i•; !'. ,,r .. :,"> . , , ,.,, :,i :~ ,: ,_,; )'· ,,.,, -~~-V>~:.4-:--'•<,•l- *••·_, •• _,.~•~-;- i._'h-:, __ ii-,Jc ~:,· tt'"'. ~-- ,,,-, •.• , ,\.•, ,,..,\:~,_. ,~1i,rl ~ .. ! , the Director of Pub•Hc Prosecutio~s against the finding by the : . . learned trial judge that the gun.produced in.the trial was .not the gun used in the actual shooting·of,,the'complainant,)and(the: '.',<r,;·,,:.,.;t. Ln, consequent reduc:tfon: ot· the ·ch,·~r.ge; !Jli!l pr91juc9.(!. ,ii~, ,en _e.xl1 Wi\J,p · . :} : : c:m,: t !iiJ'.: Ui:1 mi,~ th,li; h,ad b{!{i!U. IJS£ro iW'i:!.!~ily to $~CO!";_ .tpe ,:t;J'llp}fl:itf~ilt;'. t' .• ,' ' For convenience_;l'I,~ ·WiJt r:'tf,e_rGttRs ~~e tCf!flYJcte,d ;,R~,'1. S!>i1~~~~n~1D}1.,;J •. respondent in this, ca~e •. a~thoug~,i,~~i.~~.s ;H'.9S.~;aPp!)~l.~l.:~gatn.f~ i,\ ~tie i~\I'. i rl~ i J19 , 9.f: • j;h~ JE!~,r.,H~~ J!'i,~Js J. Hq9J,:;J : t[1a t .. th1iil;'fi, 11,ll.l; eli ld;,':nfil.ri. _ti'l~t- • :,:•:' ' ,\! :t;<.',~f :i ·,:' •_'' :,:•. <:a, ';• t" n ~~-·•d t--.<~r-,\·, t1 C'.';9l c<1'r.1'(tf:$~rif,: -w~~-·no ·tHiiitl··•i;tr·{}t'-hrli:{h·~· t>i'.°hu.~',,1q.\t('jj1;'•·t\r".r#~~--····:. The facts of this case are that the respondent was charged •with .. · · aggravated robbery contrary tg ,$1!Ctipn ?~t .(2) .9,f ::1;~~1 p,en_al SC;i.~~.••i.~hlil·,:i2r particulars of the_ offencf3. b~;P.!fr:th!lt,on rt.~e,J5~h. 1qf 1,J.,~i:ie,0 W~9.,•,i.:,~.'t:i:I Lusa~a, jointly arid wh i 1 ~.t,,a!=.ti .!19::tPg~~.ti~'\ ,~! ~~);;1i5911J1~. per,sori,s! ,~l'~nown and * amed with_a fireal111,- he;di!lrst~ali.on,,fia:t mp.tqfi ca.r,,~o~:~:th cash and persa,al property to i;he tqtal. valu~ pf,K~. 110 19Q! ,.the ,ij~J,of. · "~'. O • :., ,, •,•. ,,.__,!.ii',; - ' ·-. '. ,'C' ,'~:. C• . ,;:;·.• . .:,i/, . .- , ,,(·,, -.•, ; '•', _,;I f., ';'. . : _ • . ,' ' I - .2 --.,· 0 Qi ' . • .. ; , · ~ , . t :.;1 :,,-r:.'. H ' . • '.1. ,' -·-. : , ' ;iJ-; ·1 ~{.- -:':~l-,:::r_. ·::hatj.t_~yC..-.~)tt,1 H;· ~J?-\t.hct. Cosmas Kazimoto and at the time of stealing such property did use or/ th rea en to use. ac~~a . -.~/ f~?-f ~.~l' t /,1:v·,J l1'~\; :ti'! ,\ny' :6v&'iW rf ~ii.,/:-.:~: 1.'~.'~•-~~1_, The prosecution evidence was to the.'effect thatrthe;cQmplafoci.11 had his vehicle stolen from him at gun point and,was,s1Jotc,at.1:iT.1Jr~~?1i7.f hours after the theft the respondent was found i~ the back sea,t <>f:.fh.!!r};'.' stolen motor vehicle,. and, when .a police off1cer~0quest1oned h~lil,;:i#fwas !' noticed that he had gun wrapped in a·•white,pap~r;-Wh~ch,,was ta~en:.a~ay from. him after a struggle .with the polic1f off1c~r~e ;A baUhtt~ii\1,, officer identified the gun 1)-5 having armtssing, parti fr:om, it whl<;. IJ,imMe it doubtful whether it could be used for firing,, .. The complaln~nt,was taken to hospital and found to be• suffering:'fr.om. gun. shot.,wounds,i,.,, Subsequently at an identification parade he· identified the respondent hi b as av ng een · .: ',. il t·· ' · ;~;-;!t'.'i>-,2~1en\. '~11.r> tt~·'.tti:j•:t.~J?- ;)f ,f,k·:>f-t;i~(i\lt• .. ,.,,'_·/; , :;-· '·,.:;•-,.-.~•,!-, •··, ~;,-',' ;_•\; ',• ft '1-s. 1 ~V.1•:~ti imrmf~tWl~t-- J:t,i <~i,;4ifft\iljf{,-,;-i · '_ In considering the evldencEl.;t~(~}~frr.? .. d tr~A~ t,!.1dPt)1~l~1i,t{h;,.t .)ri:: there was doubt as to whether, although the. complainant was,,an·honest/' :·· ··:,:( :\.,(<·'•'.·,.'~iYl!_/;i·;,ti;\i'._'.'' ·, witness, he had sufficient opportunity to ob.serve .t.he respQndent:to·'> · ··:t·; :1~;:,;1,y"•:t't°,'t.,-,J;,•~·,\ .. 'l•;•"/!-<;_,4!"' r-~~).',1-1~,t\·.l:/. : ... ·· .. · ...... ,•_, . i. ·': '. . . :· ~Sa• _an .: Ji . . ·; ... -~~..,;r~ · "l hisa. · . · •'. ., .. , , ·· '°·:;,:·,, ,.-.•,:,,, •,, "l ,JJ"~ ·_. · !/•.·.,•., : '•· .. ' ._, • ·.· .~- -.'-: '•' ,_. ·. . ·. · , , . . . ' { ' :, ' :, . . . . f ,, •,/, ,,· :;~ ·,.',, ·· .. '· ,,-._; ,:·.-.~.: :.' r ·- .... -· :: - ···: ,_. .. _,.,· .. ,., .. -.. made it saf~1 iP. rely o_n_ ti]~ . identif~R~r,1_?TT~t-iiAt \W'.~;;i!ii;~j("fi~:/:: ;J;;~} learned trial A~89t fp~n,d . ~h11t,;~h,e r~s~Rn~~~~}~d ,B~~n- ,.1.~,&~~;~8ki,.:i,~)tiillf possess 1 on of the, !l)ptor c~ r thr1~' ~~H!tffi:t~f 1~~-}h.t;\~;~~R~ ;,?tr~1lf11~[~~~il trial judge went on, t~. s~y ~h,,~ · 17f ,,w~F,,s\,i~ .~a\\~'~'~ 1,~~i~\1;':,~?,ijft'Ji}~at ·. . was p~oduced in, cour.t was,~~~?~~l]ii;n:h~f1-~.,~,?~1;>~,~:~~;:~.~~\.~nA~li~ti,¾~<i;R.'.l .. ; OOTplamarrt, but she d}d f,1('d '.a,,,t~~tt~~tffl~9~P,l~!,n~~t11~1e,JP~1j~~,?,~~::,;::::·:: sht ·•···H--,.:t'••·'~·-.,·•·l_ ....... -,, · -;. \\~_::. ~- t:'r~f;'l~ (.1-( · 1, ~{, : t~ij.~:;,ce·rnr.~-0,,:;iU~Y~~t~c{t~{h¼-i)?:t(~ii;t~f~J}. o '" In his appe~Tl6'~fo;e '.u~ '\11i1:}J~~n;~J~if e2ibt:~~6~1~J¥1;ii~tisr~t( has argued that, whether C>r not t~e''gun 'produced as_·an exhibJ}tJf -: >, > .. there was evidence, wh l.!=~ w~s . ~,u ~ye~;.~Y, Jhe 1}r;f ~ 1 Ju~~~ ,·:tii;~s¥RP~~Eicf court was. the one. that had been used act11iiuy to shoot' the ,CO~,Riainant:/ ;_ ,''' : r::~:-,'; :'.· ; r" ·.t:,/1';~71'),~~-fr'i~--- ',,, L' ·. 1_ '--' i'' f,,:~-.- by medical evidence, that t~e complainant hac,l in. fact been shot;,,-in . ··. -· , the circumstances therefore it was argued.that th.ere·was evid~nce that .-··:.r1t_.:n~/t."--,.~'~:.-,,1:·?r some gun had been ;,use.d a~j:her~ \t~~}q:;?~p~;\t"1:Rri~iiThl$~~~f\r,~~g~~ce( 'i-'~·,.·.~,\(l'.,t-,-'11 :: 1, '.'.\,':',.'•,,\,·:•· ·_:,_,:••. ;,,:, ·.· 'In ~ep ly; Mr:'. Sima~g~ ;'1l~ai 'ltf i:ouiiSel'oH~~,ii~lfr'q1', t.11~fr~~pon~ ~rg.!00 tilat tl-e~ lfclS • 1~1~1~ ~,~ ·in dfca:s~11df :~ih.fs'l}i~tJ:r~'!~''~!p~JF~':::1: . a conviction, in t~at ext'raneit{,'~~idenci•·such'1i~?~peiit¥caririg~i h}iirtii1,i ' -::i_Y-~;;i/:/, cases· should have been adduced before the"Court1·· Jn·~:r,s·•cro~~t~PPeal;-:):t (1'~••;_1-;_'.-,, •. 1,i~,--~•/l.•.\,''>-"-•j':'.i;r,,1·,::-.-:;J;.:;.:,- Mr. Simango argued that in any event there:was insufficientl.~~id~nce''·'·C: ·against the respondent,· 1,n thi\t·therresptmdent1 was':.found:·oiiTy sitting · . .:,, . ,·;:J-;.. ln the back seat and_ th~. ,{_q1'l~..\t'P?Sses~lon'·three hoHts'' li!-ter' was, l!Ot)'.t, -~ 1'1•· ~-:·:.· tt--.;'.,t~r<''.~~-~L::.:•t1:': -~s-nl}~·ti\'ii:tt.-~ · ..... :··,•,r-;·"J.'·,-';)r~hfl,,1 .. , , • f \ . ' \.<,.'.>·.::,.,~.~~ . .:_,'·f.: -.-:;• ~~-i..-:-~,,r1\~".\ · 4 ,\,i·~ 1,r~1,i-;-··, ,,.-\-'>··\~:y}.•·-- :~. ~~,'- .. i~r-.:~.,,- .. ~•• .. --,,:-, · .. •;,_.,~.~·;,0,•1'-t'' ··· ·., :'·)f ·,,,·:_-·,,•1 'i,<_".',.-;:.\•J,; 1.''.,!.::1i::;--~••';.•t1 · ·· - ·:,·-·. --,. _.. •·!: ,, '; \"' :-1:'.:c,'·:•r :;; ·.:::,J. Y''i\fl.f,?l'l:i.- .:-.···:-'.•i:·•.;· · 1,;, i·;. ~ ,_.,.,,., i _r·,r i,. ;l <; :r:,::•.n1,1, (/(.'. _.,.••-·:., • .• ..,_ • ..._ .. ,-,~;•·. ,.:,..-,i1.:·,)'>:.., _-,~··~•.:t;• •• -~-~ !,1-t',. , . . · i · · , - . . "· .... ';•:· '·'.,_: . .,.,.:-;• .. ,. •; '~;;_ t-·(',·,.;. ·)'!_,_·•,' . - .)·~,•---: t_h1_<.' .• -,.;,., : • - , , · . · .• :. r·-- _ .... ;•,_~- ·,::' · , .y· , _ 1: ·._. -·-· '' :•• · .. ,, ... :· .. ,~ - . L ·-. · · • · . . , · , . , .•. . ' '. · · ; .. ; ... . :;>:'t .. : .. ; .,+ :Iil)lijr lilTl'l~ \' 3/so.~.~-~ •• ;.'./f\t :.·::.-;> •>/::~7.i~_?· ,-~.•\.- .;v/\.- .. /:{t0it~Vi- ' ' ' ' • • • " ' ' .. \ ! - • • • •• I _.. , . . . . \ :: ' ' •,I_. : • " . I, . . . . , .·. :,· ·-•i ,,.• .: ., . \,l ':,'. . ·,: '· · ··.1: . ·· ,:_ :., \ • • '_.,:-.-·: · . · '-:• · ' . -..:::, :·,;:(.'\ •.:·. '_ • • . . . ,_,:, .,, L . . Ni.cl" / ' 'l•·' ·,' 11., .'· ,<f('.;.:i'• . ,1··' I·:,;, :,'.'\. , __ ,:.-('j': .:,·.:•,,,:•: · .. · , . ,;:_.-,-, . -~·:1'·,.<··,. • .• -";'.,.:,·'.1· . . ' ,;/ •;: ·,,-,;,_',,', •,, .·,• . . .. , :- r~~,~-: :ry:· rNt!·::,.: ·.,i,! • i_• r :r i:·:·:- - :: :,.:"-,,•-:----·._::-:.~----_:}\~}}~ll\; .•-"1-1·:i~i;;rr\~.:• .. .-,,:. It iSJi,:'ten trom11-t~mfal_':.t9:i! ·certain ;: so recent as to exclude any inference other than·.;i;heiguilt of 'tne:t ':"f·,,,,,1,. respondent. Mr; Si mango further· argued that ;-fri· ;any\ev~·ntF1tiwaf .~.: •· i,~lt] unfair of the learned trial judge· to ·disbelie)ie<the 1rei~bnderit;l~ri~-~ < :!' he said that he was merely accepting•:a:.ilif'f1in;the stolen vehicle.; .:;~. ••;1:t' . ,•. ,· · ~--.•. ,: --·: .; , ... · .. · ,'. x ;-,, -_· .. :;·'.}i~;f7}€~.:zi As so frequently happens, · 1 n . ,~hts _case• there,• seems t~ : be s,om~~i& ·::. misapprehension. as to what us,~, <;,~n A!l' m~~-~;or,<ev 1 dance c,f ', re~~n{.:<;: ;:',/4:f-•' possession in a case of thi~iJ~flt~-~e.~ ,, 1~av,ec;.~~id }t bet,qr::El, ,~A~::~e • repeat that, when there is evt~~nce • offi.~enti fica~1on, from- an,,~9p,est, , witness, a doubt as to th.e r'eliabil ity :of suctii:evidence •because 'of · ·. · poor opportunity to observe can be remedied•·by:;st1pporting,eviden<:e of something more which consists of ~ connecti~g ·Hnk betwee~ th~ respondent and the offence. In that event the qt1e.s!f;ion ·of how:recent 1'< ·., is the possession, is ~l!IJlla}~r~aL extent what expl~na,:t,19n; str~.:r~S_P,99</~pt gaye. ~~~t iS i~pprtan,~i;tt/·: > that the po~si~jJJ-prel.ii~le J~ent,i.ficilt!9!l, ~,Yj~~-~~~. J~)!'lil~!!;illB9~~;~¥ ••. supporting ~Vitjf!n~e Of <:O~.riep,tf~n :WJ~n ,ilO ti~tll :~f;j·~n:H. Q\1;~:f:;:i~,~i~r;it\, Mr. s i ma~gc,' s J~rgunients ,<,;_9npern Ing any ,def e'.fl,:1.i!:2~:'N11:i::'rKi,1~I?t~:• g.f{jl/[~I _ . ,_ recent posse.~sinn would only apply if. the:,recentfipc,ssession 1te,ref;t!Jf!\~ole · reason fcir t:n~ pon\'.~CtlO~'., .. ~sJe, .. ~!J!,l()i~teq out, ~ll~t is, -~~1;\}~~!::9~'~( here ... T~e . eyJ cle,n~e :to s.~ppprt e:t~~t1~~V.if!ilW\ ~t 1:h~,:.,r1:1enpe ,:9r J:I:fi,}!)),,) identification by a~ h(l~,ef~ Wi\n,,~~,;'~MPPClnYl~}Y'. ~~e, t~,t~t-co.~~i5J:l~:~:/ ':• ·with tttei.stolen vetii<:1,e.·.t~f p~viate\any pp5sibl ity,'. of;.flone'st:1m{sta~~:i{~;;.'f.: -, 1. Therefore so far as ~cro~s-:aP,P,~al is_ concerned, we 'ar~'. g\{J}>~h~~~;lsfie~. · that there was ~µfficient evide,r:ice ,to just,1f/i-i-:fie'1co~vl'ctitin'To¥Eth?i. Qf'd£ re?pon~ent and j,1,!~ fros~-appe11,l ,is cllSl)\i.~s~ci. _. ·•·-. :·_ · . · • ,(/. Y.\t,, .. · -. . ,:;., -.: iir-, '. _ ,.: ';,:'>(·. : . ,·,;\1Afif;\\,¼~< .,.t:Ji'.f:{;i},:i½;r:::< ' So far as the ·appeal by the learoad•i·D1 rector: O:fi•Public ,~Joos. , ,, . .,,,;,:{'t:}·/::;(/''.' :.>~f,.i .', i '•i ' , . ' , I Jf~~_,;·• .. >,:•,~,t',,·.: Is concerned we are bound to Sity :that, wh~re .t.her:e .is''evi.denc.e,;,of,;;gun ·_, shot wounds, that .t.111 suffir.e· to support a :charge '.of having '>cariHe.d:i.·;''''" ,'.,_.·'·.,·,1;';?,\''•:·_.';; out .. ~ro~bery with the)1ttRf ~f}fE!,~!'.;IJI• :,_J,t·":iS c~r~ai,J1lY: not,!l~f,~~~~rt that aifirearm or otl:lereYi,(f.~nc~lUfh As .,sp,~~ <;ArtrlA~es shout,.d:',!i,;'. ',, · produced and idE!n~~f:i~!t ~ri ~u~r:~J!'C,\ll!!~l~l)(;~S. with _Mr. Si mango th,~_\/1WM,;~,Mt'1tial-{9::ff9E!t,~9;.,,~µ;ip,~,r}J;~),~,~.~~gf:9:f\. ,' . this nature for the're to -b~,a~e,~u~.i1):~YJ~~~i~ ,~r,:1:#~-:~,~).,ifipe:~\~l;½{i1{\/ In this case tl:l,E!, -~~pl~i,:ia,nt 'c~ '~-~l~-~~<;.~, t~~l);?f-1-!a~\:~.h~~;;:\:i:\~.(;,;;:; firearm. :s.uppol'ted by medical evid.ence • to that effect~ was\uodoubtedly sufficient:. to support a charge of armE!q aggravated robbE!rY• under section294(2) · of the Penal Code. learned Director of Public P.ros.ecutions is all.owe_d. · · -~/:{~i~f t}:::'~0\i . •' ,., It foH.ows therefore that· the appeal by th~ Joie ;if P,:il~r~e,ho,~~,r.~r';,I · · · -· '''t•'/ ~ ·-• ', ,'-.:-,~,1;i/<-'.·.,'.,_,··:· ·,.·!,":,':--· ·1,r,/'-:\),::;·,·,rH'.it'·',f'f~W~---•!', ... ''.•1 /:'i: ·:_,' ..... ::.1_···· '.··,u~y-'.·:•\'1·;.'•,-,:·,·.', ·_-•:1"''\~'.;'•'),:•,.·,··, ,.• ':i ',.:. ,·I· • • ,'. ' ·•_if•;..,,•,•,-'~1, ·., ."j _., . . ' . /. . ;'. .,, .. · , : ' i . ' .... :.---:- :,· • ...... '/~:·· f y ,: ,.,, .. _., .. , ' •- . , · , ' . ' . • \ ' • -,:{~("'i:,1.'," .. -·,, /. ' . . -~-' . •_;,, S· ',·.-•--"' ,,'!/'./::'(-, ,,, ;_. ::';·.\, .. , '·.. ··. '. / . · · ·: .:,- ·}.<:. i (, .. •. : ·,· :., ,, . -. ·' -. : • ' . ' ,' , ,1 ,,._ 1•.,• ',, ·; •,- ·_ , • · .,. ; . ' .'· '. '. '. • . . . . . ,. , ' · ·; ' ' · . . ~ . . ' ' - ' ; ,' . , , , " • • ' , , ·, ' ' ' • • i , , ' • I , , , , , , ' - ,-_•1·• 'l :.::":¼ ·. -,~ ··,h: ,;?·~ 1,~;~~~! • . . ':,,,;, l Q i. . .- • ·t ! . ' 1 h 1 :> i'lf';-:•~::-d ~ , i nvo l v i.f(J, t!'.•t~i.~ , · · ,-, · ','<!'"'.:t.1.\•'f:,:i:'t ·,, r • 1, ,·':.tJ,\-.. ~c , '. , i '1 , ,1i:tije.1_) ~-.\cicHJtinfJ" tJf' -the· c1,~11P:liiinant,. --·a.ntj· \no -· • ; ; ; · ·.···-•- ·- :: :"":"':'%t,, ':,<; •. f,:;,W::'.,{:iikE (;~~-$~1~ i,f .f.~~;,r. •I..~;jiti··~~i~;~~~:,'~ -~~~ .•l•!t:~:-.i~,t•:i:;·_~\ ·)'· :'( ·tH•.4. H-r:t ·•.ii' ' '"' ;,t;; ;;·:r·(i ! r) ACTING• 1SUPREME ,COURJ\JUDGE ·:-:" .. , _··:;;!;ii~~{f:~ti~:t ~.::;n u:~·\; Li1 L;·:_~ cons~qL,•zr,t. rriducti&n oi' the. crnt.ru~~. · ,/ ' '. ;,r/ · 'i"M'~i (t·"•Chai-la•' -.:;,-;•, . . .. ··· ,., · , r·r'(;":-;-;'.':. Ht ., ' ,,,{_11l,fl..,.t. ,,. <··1· ... , •.• , :.·· .. · t.:C l !.. J: ,(•· ' n;;spr.mdl',nt iii this;. (;,JS;!)' ·t.-½.i_i u • H,v- c,y;v;:onn.;nca we wll i rllttr..-i;o: the convit.";t\_i!4:l ~~t$_OIJ: ~-$ !~~'1ft1[1:!;f itl tho:igl\ ,he hd. er.o!;S~~f)peale(Fagitnil'.~j.':;'.,J)/·;• ·:'_.., ·: ~r~~ r:<~:;;:·; :,.,:_·:: :.:_:. ··:: •:.~:;·.~;;:,;(-,i\<t.~;_)-·:;; .. » .. vi'''' ',·, • '. .. ·' •,.,,,,,,., '·· '•'"'' ,,,,.,,.,, · ·-.: t -~'.·f_-. t/:~\~_i}\t _· ...... ;: :··:.':i:;~i:?\1;;:.~;--·;8j·:.'.,,_;_~:.·. ·1· r'i. • l · 4,··, .. ;~~- ---> : ·. o. _.,.,; '"'':I'"',:. , , (·, .f "-.""--,,·! l '"":-~.•.'t',''o' " "'. .m, :"-t-" J ,,, •. ;.11·. ,,,,_:.,. , : • : ", : ... • .. _,:_. ,,_·_ .. :~ . " • ,_: '-: Ttie \",,:·,,. of thh c:ilS<l are th,rt the resp-mid~nt w~s·cttarg~d. wJth, il<JFi"l.lVil.t$:ci r-cbbsry umtrary t,::, · SeCt;ior. l!S4 (2) # tl1i/P~nal;.cl;$.i{-tl}i pc.ri;iCJJl<l-1'$ ,,,. tlli;, offp,nce beln!J-.•tll~t /Jlktl'lf.l lSt~;~f',)'une, 19/30,<i)·~t;;f~\; \ _.;·:<,_>': Luf.a!rn, jointly and wlltlst 1.1ctif'1g, tqg~tl'ltl':;l(<it!lc,,,s~-p~rsons,,Qn_ki1Qlr{!l', ; .-, t.lT','!i'J ¥,lth a fireil'rt:i, h~ :o1i$. /i't~ul · ufi,i!i- flat ·lilt\tor car ~ ~tlL'> and i1i:•'.i°t-l c:,,.~11 c,1,j p0·,~(;mj pl"Oj,P.l'ty tc, th~ totaleVatu~ IJf. 1<3, 140~00; tli\:l pt~f'of;) ·, _,. ' ' ·1· •r\\· .. '/ '(·~·,:, -_-.. :. ~ I ' .. -: .. s _It,',· './"' . ;',":: ,· :·. .•. ·,.' • •• " • , · , , , ' ,. - - " • ' ' ' - - ••• • /2 Cos.rrias Kazi mo to