Felix Muhongo Mukubesa v The People (Appeal No. 7 of 1986) [1989] ZMSC 126 (23 May 1989)
The conviction was quashed because the magistrate's sole reason for preferring the complainant's evidence was a flawed assumption about the direction of a fall after a push, which constituted a misdirection.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1989] ZMSC 126
- Parties
- Appellant: Filijimongo Mukubesa; Respondent: The People
- Court
- Supreme Court of Zambia
- Jurisdiction
- Zambia
- Case Number
- Appeal No. 7 of 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal; Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Procedure, Assessment of Evidence, Credibility of Witnesses
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Filijimongo Mukubesa
Appellant
The People
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal; Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the magistrate erred in preferring the complainant's evidence based solely on the direction of a fall after an alleged push
- 2 Whether the conviction was safe given the reasoning of the trial court
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was quashed because the magistrate's sole reason for preferring the complainant's evidence was a flawed assumption about the direction of a fall after a push, which constituted a misdirection.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside
Orders
- Extension of time granted
- Leave to appeal granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
ill ntE· 'SUPROIE COURT Of ZAMBIA : ·H01 D1r11 . AT :Lu••1r• .: ·' · ~ .' '',, ·1:.., .t--:i ~·-1: ··: ! ., . .. ,. · -· r ~ ..... · · (. Cr:imlll•l·JuliJJ,dl~tlon) t ··•) ,l;~d~"~.;; ::. h-~s -~r~..,~d tha\_tt1e r~~~~nsr; _ '. ' ,. ' • . ' ~ ,;,, " · " .. ,.·, •1 ··.-. : · , . • • · 'I• •,; • ; • • ·" ; . , . _ .,. ~v,.;!- ~· ·fJ ,..t ,.., • . :1-: , , . ,.- :• · .. "f!b.' .... ~ •• J • " 'I t',;,t ~t I J 'J'I, "' t'"'-... ,, ·'t.'O• ,.. ,...0 · f~LirJIJHONGO MUKUBESA.~r:-·!:.~,; 1·,V Appellant· i ·:· · • ·' ·. f :- ''(' : · · .. : ~,~ TIii· PEOPLE :i, 1\ :,, .. 9_·-~•.f;~.-.;·· .. Rese9ndtnt·:: '." ~ ' -~ · 't 11fil-. t tf~ ·. .. y,- •:i t v/ Qi° · 1 " ~ ·•1' • . .,,1,..-: 'tn u•,.. : " •:'_~ ·::.,_;:;~ ; • ""OJ 'Vt•\::, .., t , , : . ~ .... .... • • . . . • • , , . • •• "'- · · • ,,. t:: , - • ... ' • • ' :1 t:! •: ~J f.: 1rrt, t .l-1'1';-~ . j~-~ii r;i.i;~ -~ · ffi ·~ i.:H ,~!t; ti C-ORAM: Ngulube. ·o.c. J., Gardntr,· AJ.s~.l '.~ 11i/ ~~s~-; .. ·:i' _,_.i_..~;;r:-;~--t:'.l _: . . . , 23rd Ma.,,. ,1989. ,·_ '•/ ,: :: ' . .. . ··- •• . , • • • • t . . . - · ,. ·, -" ',.:::,<f of ti!~ St~.~eJ~iii".\-:;i'J,f::."t,\ft fc;,-r-:.;utd ·: D .. M. Luywa of Lu,w~ and . Co.:. for; the·rap,.11_aflt;~11~1:,~/b/.,t:<···1:~:~>l'lr. R.-SlYakU111rian. As,tstant~;-:sanl(Jr ·state"'Advoc,1:e:t~-~theistatt : . • I • + I I -~. " : • • I ' • .", • · : ; . • • { ' ' • I • • • • t O 1 • I • o J • • ••• •• --; ' ,: • -; :1•·~ ·. •:/ V/'(1:1 ;··•11; ',' i. H:rd > · ... ~,~r., ~-~- ~~~ tv~~ ~ t\dffl',it ~~t:, ~-;-~°'~'1~~.-·t,:f~·-.l'l.~-f.~~,.::: .. . · .. ' '. . .-. .. . ·, ['; '·"'~. !,·; 1-h~i -l~gbtt·at-~ ·ror pr·afiaJ'·T?ltl~Ftt~1{~d.d.1:ina~ r,if .. \ '. pu~r;~(! fr.~·: n,"" 't·!•'dn.i t!:'>•: 1:; f. , \ , .... . . : \ ~ • · ·. This, 1s ~n application, fo~ a11 ,'. X·:t~n•\9.~;--~f i~.l1~e,.,l '?: p,t~~ :~~tice · ·Qf applicetion for leave to appeal. ~ . . . '. . . ' . ' .... . i~;":_\ ,·~:·:· .. :.: , :-... ·· . · · .· .. _· ' · .. ·-:::·.\,((?./~(~ :·· i \ ::_. -:/ :.--=· . " ·. "The fact s •:of the !case :art ~that 1'the:'appl1d~ri1i.tii~1}i~~d1'spute '· .. ··. with the· woman complat~ant; PW. 1.· arising ·out ~,. :t~e '>fns~ltl_ng by : the con1plain,nt I s chfldren of 'th• appli~an~• s,'wife~,·-.· ,'.ih~---~omplli:ria~t·i: gave ·evidence that, .during the 'cour~e?r~f. the d,is~ute·; the ·appl'~cant had bttten her on the face causl;ng,lto fall -down •. ·To1f1ppiicant hlm1el1 gavtt evidence that the complatn~nt had gr~p~cl ~·im •.by-- the -neck; and ~ in ord_er to ciuse h,r to desist, he ~' .. ~1;had -pu·sh~ h~r-~way;·-~s .·a __ · · ' . reiult of which ,ha ftll down •... ~ ~a•.··•_ .. \ ....... _ •. _"~~:. i-._ ••.•.• i,. .•• ·.-.• • ~-.. ◄ ~ ..... ~ ~"'~-: •·,,'3,p·;---.~---., ,·;-:·~•::_ . :., . . . . . . . . .. ' •"f ... . {\ft'-J'<-1}"" .... ("¥.ff . • . . _There was medical evidence "that the· compla1n"1t s1:1stained ... .. :-.:\~f$~·-·_:. :·,_. ' . - .• ... -,t i~,. .. l!"s tr~ ,, . 1i.,..... . . . . . '••..; ·~-... ~ .... -.... ' . . - . , ., ' . • . ', . . ~ ~ . \ • I . . . . • iacer~Uon · of the forehead and of the upper lip;··_. _-The 'trial · ·. . · : · moglstrat.e accepted that the case had to ~ ~t{td1cld~: .. 9~ · ~---·,: ·. · :. '. · . ·. question of· credtb1 ltty. ln dec1d:1ng _.wh~~h -~f.-1th, _part~es ·t~ bel~~ve •;· ·- ~ -~, ' .... , ·~ fc.•,. ... :· .... f. .. l'i'i(, ,· •• "!""'ti~' '"" he had this to say·- r, .. • 1 •~v ,-,~; -., .. . ;-:t.'.!.\'1.. .. .l1-J.~· :~.1• .... 1. L;si:: . .':1-~,-~. •:-"'7::•:-:.·. ,/: i.,,:;_ .-:.--~~ ·'. . ' • . ~ were actually faciJYJ each other Wllll lt ws·. Slld that Ull ac(USail . · lnfllct.ed oo bl<MS cri her. H:,d the acx:usEd just pJShed · ;Uhe ·corplalnant she was ~lrg to sustain injuries at the mck or hlr head n:I ootcn the fcahld mi l'ID1tif. :,·,· .. : • .. , . ' . -;.i .~ __ ; .• ·- • ,. . . · -~. :.. ' · . • • • . ' .- . The. 111glstrat1 then went on to s11_ that lt•:fo.~fed front thls that ·. th~ only ·1~glcal explanation was that· the' appllc•~t 'ha( . . · . . ' ; • .. .. ,. ' - ' ~ - "' • if • "II • ,.. C A -, ... : .. I -,. • •• • /J2 beaten.-~ •• - ' '. I· :, ••.}, • • • I • t I •• ' · · · - - •;_ . , •• , .-. - · - ,J • • • - I j· I I I, I i . l · , . .. . ' ' ,· . ( Mr/' ~uywa· ·.on beha 1 f of the applicant has arg~,d ihat. the··: r,~s~,'.l.ln~ of the magistrate was incorrect in 'that 1t ·was ~rong•:to· 'Say th4t·. ·. a. person who is pushed from' the front must····1n~evlt.aQlY.\ fal:l \on~his In view of.·the ,fact' that-.the .. or her bac~ and not on the face.. magistrate relied solely on tills argument in de~ldlng ~hlch :.of.:.tha parties to believe, Mr. Luywa argued that there had .b~en a .m1.~di~e·ct1on · as a r•sult of which the applicant should nev~r · hav.~:'been convfcted. · .:. . > f , •• • ,; ; rt, .,,.-,•·: .• ~ . ·: . •. ·. • , • • • • , ., ' • • I • • • : . , ' • . , •. • • . 1 •• • t '\S~, r J. 11 .:i. J ,1_, r • · ... ~;,_', ., ... ··. , •"I, ~ • ' • v l , .. 1,,. .. 1, • • , • .,_ : , •. • . .. • . , , , I • Mr. _Slvakumaran on behalf o~ the State has . r:1~.t'- put f. Qrwar.d any serious -argument against the points put ·forw~rd·by. Mr. Luywa. and hU' apparently indi~ated that the St~t•:·dot$1°AAi\.supp,o~.i -~hl$ ' .. . conviciior:i •.. -·· . · · .: · : _. ,.~.ii-~-~·:_ · :· : . :,. .· :·: ·~-... .. ~ _ ...... _, ____ -----. ------... ----·- · q n -~ ~ !IJ' .,.· . · . · .. · i t .. ·.',·'.: We agree witn M~ .. LuyWa that' it was wrong:·tor'the··~gistr~te· to say that a person who is PU$hed from .the·-front ·must inevitably:- -~ .. - land on his or her back, and ·we·atso agree that, as this was the .. · oniy reason given by the ,magistrate for preferrf~g the evtden~e· ·ot . the ·complainant · to that of the : applic:ant,' this "convlctl.on ccmnot · · • St,.n" f,;.,,_.-. f~!-♦t ;c,~~·:1 .., l"i' ·• · · :-:~••,','J~.~~ • . . ••·~ ~:'\ ~-, ... ; ••.• ,;t• .. , ·\ t\.,.. • ~ r.:{~ Iii ♦"': ' ·. , .. ., .. \ ., l ·.·,:·!, '1 r , - ' • 11: • • ,•• • : ".' r, , • • • ~ t ,-11 • • • . ~·• · , _; , ;,: , • • •• ~ ~ _, • • • • t · • · • ~ ' • : ~ • I •: ; ' ,, • ._-,- ,. •~ O o ! • • • • : : O • • f • • • I ' - I - ' . . , • : The appllc:otlon for ·,an, extem's.lon ~-8,f~ time tis. '.gran~ed ~ :·the_;J .. appllc:ation for .leave to· appeal ,11:grantedrand iWil,l_ ~,,tr~ultedt-as the appeal., For the re1sons that·we have 19.lven!the.appeal 1s"aliowed. the conviction. 1 s quashed and the sentence. 1 s : set· aside. ·. :, ;H : ,;1;,:, :: ...... -~ ... --.--. . - . . . ' ' ·,:: . • : : , \:: (''Jj ;:,,,J:~i ;"f).'·;.-~I fall ck\Yi~. ~ tfi~ :~J:/t'b;·~·nt.r,f11::,~lf . • • : ' 1' t,\•:.,; • / ·,•;•,•,' ' , , . • , , IO ' • ! • • . , i,, ' . ' ; , .,_, , . • ;:·\·,;; :d·'.1; .• :>: t}•;,1· ;i':t. C. Ol\!;'l.t!r'l~~t h•3.0 1i1ra~d ~i.~i~_.r::~~.•~e~~-- ·_:!H°jd,- t :, :::"<"1 • • • ' • ·,•;•·:.1:~ ··. ·:·.1. '. -i·) ,::·•:••1;:c: :,:r. t ,] c(.;.~tst •. 11.u ~ • ~ _• 't , ----:-• .. •1 .......... ', C«- ~:~t • . ···············••4!·~····,.,. .• , ....... ~ ....... . --~-n~·. pu.~~ -~r;.~~e'y'La~·-&\:- • : •:•4': o 1;:;:~l-~-~~ .. • ~ • • •• ~. · , I~ I •• : ·. I , ' ' •• • • . - . r ' • • . . M. S. Ng~ltiltt ·: . ·: DEPUTT CHIEF JUSTl~E-:_. ,'·_ .. ;·;··,-;,in-·. -; , <:. ,. ·:;· ·::;,::f'.'' ;(,·.-J a.f ·;_;·:t·. :_q;r:;1r, dv~: .. -~ti. :tr!nJ . · . : ·: . • • • • I )1/ ••• . , · I • .... ·, .... , • ' , ( ," • \'. ';,, .• ' •..- ,-,·-1•· c•.,,_, .. ,·. !-.-,~' ~ .... t~;., ---d~!~ ... :-1-.-,.,1·· ,-•. ,._., .. W:.1¥' •\,.~~f. ,_~. • . ...-: • . ~ I • ~ > Oil I•.\, ► ,_..,, (; .._i, (!) JJ . .. .. . . : . . . •,