Muleya v Mwenye (HPC 145 of 2014) [2014] ZMHC 74 (24 July 2014)
The Defendant's failure to file a defence or appear within the prescribed period entitles the Plaintiff to judgment in default as per the applicable rules.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] ZMHC 74
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Guntila Muleya; Defendant: Stephen Mwenye
- Court
- High Court of Zambia
- Jurisdiction
- Zambia
- Case Number
- HPC 145 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment in Default of Appearance and Defence
- Outcome
- Judgment entered for the Plaintiff in default of appearance and defence
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Entry of Judgment, Failure to Defend
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Guntila Muleya
Plaintiff
Stephen Mwenye
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment in Default of Appearance and Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to judgment in default due to the Defendant's failure to appear and file a defence
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant's failure to file a defence or appear within the prescribed period entitles the Plaintiff to judgment in default as per the applicable rules.
Court Disposition
Judgment entered for the Plaintiff in default of appearance and defence
Orders
- Judgment as endorsed on the Writ of Summons with interest at the current lending rate as determined by the Bank of Zambia
- Costs to follow the cause
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR ZAMBIA 2014/H PC/0145 AT THE COMMERCIAL REGISTRY HOLDEN AT LUSAKA (Civil Jurisdiction) BETW EEN: G U N T IL A M U LEY A A N D STEPH EN M W E N Y E SO O f - U R T JUDICIARY . / \ ( 1 2 5 JUL V & V COMMERCIAL Rli (v 'TP ' PL A IN T IF F D E F E N D A N T BEFORE HON. MADAM JUSTICE PRISCA MATIMBA NYAMBE, SC AT LUSAKA IN CHAMBERS For the Plaintiff: Mr. E Khosa Ventus Legal Practitioners For the Defendant: No appearance JUDGMENT List of authorities referred to; 1. Order 53 Rule 6 of the High Court Amendment Rules 2012 Cap 27 of the Laws of Zambia This is the Plaintiffs application for entry of Judgment in default of appearance and Defence brought pursuant to Order 53 Rule 6 of the High Court Amendment Rules 2012 Cap 27 of the Laws of Zambia. When the matter came up for hearing on 14th May, 2014, both parties were present, the Defendant having appeared in person. The matter could not proceed for two (02) reasons. Firstly fourteen (14) days had not lapsed after service of the Writ of Summons and secondly the Defendant requested for an adjournment to enable him to instruct a lawyer. For those reasons the matter was adjourned to 23rd July 2014. At the hearing on 23rd July 2014, the Defendant did not appear either in person or by Counsel. The Plaintiff applied and was granted Leave to proceed with the application to enter Judgment in default of appearance and Defence. In support of the application the Plaintiff relied on an affidavit of service filed on 16th May, 2014 which shows that the Defendant was served with Originating Process, which was duly acknowledged by the Defendant on the same day. The record shows that to-date the Defendant has not filed any defence and has failed to appear despite being present when the matter was adjourned to today’s hearing date. J2 The Rules require that a defence must be entered within the prescribed period failure to which the claim will be regarded as having been admitted. The Defendant having failed to appear or enter a Defence within the prescribed period, the Plaintiff is clearly entitled to Judgment in default of appearance and Defence. In the event, I enter Judgment in favour of the Plaintiff as endorsed on the Writ of Summons with interest at the current lending rate as determined by the Bank of Zambia. Costs shall follow the Cause. Dated this .p L .^ .-d a y of Prisca M. Nyambe, SC JUDGE