Kalala v People (Appeal 193 of 1983) [1987] ZMSC 39 (17 November 1987)
The evidence did not support a conviction for aggravated robbery but did support a conviction for receiving stolen property, as the only evidence was possession of the stolen wrist watch.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1987] ZMSC 39
- Parties
- Appellant: Hagai Kalala; Respondent: The People
- Court
- Supreme Court of Zambia
- Jurisdiction
- Zambia
- Case Number
- Appeal 193 of 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction for aggravated robbery quashed; conviction for receiving stolen property substituted; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Robbery, Receiving Stolen Property, Evidence, Conviction Substitution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hagai Kalala
Appellant
The People
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence supported a conviction for aggravated robbery
- 2 Whether the appellant should have been convicted of receiving stolen property
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not support a conviction for aggravated robbery but did support a conviction for receiving stolen property, as the only evidence was possession of the stolen wrist watch.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction for aggravated robbery quashed; conviction for receiving stolen property substituted; sentence reduced
Orders
- Conviction for aggravated robbery quashed
- Sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment with hard labour set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ZAMBIA Appeal No. 193 of 1983 HOLDEN AT LUSAKA (Criminal Jurisdiction) HAGAI KALALA Appellant v THE PEOPLE Respondent CORAM: Silungwe, C. J., Ngulube, D. C. J., and Gardner. J. S., 17th November, 1987. W. Henriques , Senior Legal Aid Counsel, for the appellant K. C. Chanda, Senior State Advocate, for the respondent JUDGMENT Silungwe C. J., delivered the judgnent of the court. » The appellant was charged jointly with three others* with aggravated robbery, contrary to section 294 of the Penal Code, Chapter 146 of the Laws of Zambia, the allegation being that on November 15, 1982, at Lusaka, jointly and whilst acting together with other named persons stole one motor vehicle, namely, a Mazda registration EU 5572, one wrist watch and K14.00 in cash, altogether valued at K4.579.00, the property of Mukendi Kasemlle, and that at or immediately before or immediately after the time of stealing the property aforementioned, he and others used or threatened to use actual violence to the said Mudendi Kasemlle in order to prevent resistance to the said theft of the property. The other persons who had been jointly charged with the appellant were acquitted, but the appellant was convicted as charged. * It is quite clear ih this case, as the learned senior state Advocate has properly conceded, that the only evidence against the appellant is that he was found in possession of the stolen wrist watch belonging to the ccomplainant, and that as the inference of guilt on the charge of aggravated robbery was not the only one 2/reasonably........... reasonably possible, it is a proper case of receiving stolen property. The learned counsel for the appellant concurs. In these circumstances, the appeal is allowed, the conviction is quashed and the sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment with hard labour is accordingly set aside. We, however, substitute a conviction for the offence of receiving stolen property, contrary to section 318(1) of the Penal Code, Chapter 146, and Impose a sentence of three years imprisonment with hard labour with effect from November 23, 1982. A. M. Silungwe CHIEF JUSTICE M. S. Ngulube DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE B. T. Gardner SUPREME COURT JUDGE