Hamazila v Hamazila (HP/D 226 of 2014) [2016] ZMHC 48 (24 February 2016)

Hamazila v Hamazila (HP/D 226 of 2014) [2016] ZMHC 48 (24 February 2016)

The matter was struck off due to non-appearance of both parties and absence of reasons for their absence.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] ZMHC 48
Parties
Petitioner: Jean Beensi Hamazila; Respondent: Mweene Dillion Hamazila
Court
High Court of Zambia
Jurisdiction
Zambia
Case Number
HP/D 226 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Divorce / Ruling on Hearing Attendance
Outcome
struck off
Legal Topics
Divorce, Want of Prosecution, Case Management
Source Language
en
Family Law Divorce Want of Prosecution Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jean Beensi Hamazila

Petitioner

Mweene Dillion Hamazila

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce / Ruling on Hearing Attendance

  1. 1 Whether the matter should proceed in the absence of both parties
  2. 2 Whether the case should be struck off for want of prosecution

Ratio Decidendi

The matter was struck off due to non-appearance of both parties and absence of reasons for their absence.

Court Disposition

struck off

Orders

  • Matter struck off for non-appearance of parties.
  • If not restored within twenty-one days, it will stand dismissed for want of prosecution.