Kalema v Mwila & Others (sued in their capacity as Trustees of TheZambia Union of Security Officers and Allied Workers (Appeal 78 of 2013) [2014] ZMSC 86 (23 September 2014)
The court held that the respondent failed to provide adequate notice and opportunity to be heard, rendering the VAT assessment procedurally unfair and unlawful.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] ZMSC 86
- Parties
- Applicant: John Mwangi; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority
- Court
- Supreme Court of Zambia
- Jurisdiction
- Zambia
- Case Number
- Appeal 78 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Assessment, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Mwangi
Applicant
Kenya Revenue Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the VAT assessment issued by the respondent was lawful and procedurally fair
- 2 Whether the applicant was afforded an opportunity to be heard
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the respondent failed to provide adequate notice and opportunity to be heard, rendering the VAT assessment procedurally unfair and unlawful.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The VAT assessment issued to the applicant is quashed.
- The respondent is restrained from enforcing the impugned assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
contents of #navigation-content will be placed in [data-offcanvas-body] for tablet/mobile screensize and #navigation-column for desktop screensize. Skip to document content Pages Search null This document is 2.5 MB.