Sikaonga v People (Appeal 22 of 1996) [1997] ZMSC 57 (15 July 1997)
The appellant was at least 18 years old at the time of the offence, was not a juvenile, and there were no extenuating circumstances; therefore, the death sentence was confirmed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1997] ZMSC 57
- Parties
- Appellant: John Sikaonga; Respondent: The People
- Court
- Supreme Court of Zambia
- Jurisdiction
- Zambia
- Case Number
- Appeal 22 of 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against sentence dismissed; death sentence confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Juvenile Offenders, Sentencing
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Sikaonga
Appellant
The People
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment After Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was a juvenile at the time of the offence
- 2 Whether there were extenuating circumstances to reduce the sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was at least 18 years old at the time of the offence, was not a juvenile, and there were no extenuating circumstances; therefore, the death sentence was confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeal against sentence dismissed; death sentence confirmed
Orders
- Sentence of death confirmed
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Appeal No. 22 of 1996 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ZAMBIA HOLDEN AT LUSAKA (Appellate Jurisdiction) BETWEEN: JOHN SIKAONGA APPELLANT and THE PEOPLE RESPONDENT CORAM: Bweupe, DCJ, Chirwa, Lewanika, JJS. On 3rd December, 1996, 4th March, 1997 and 15th July, 1997 For the Appellant: V. A. L. Kabonga For the Respondent: Mrs. E. M. Chipande JUDGMENT Lewanika JS. delivered the judgment of the court. On the 4th day of March, 1997, we dismissed the appellant's appeal against conviction for the offence of murder contrary to section 200 of the Penal Code. The appellant had been sentenced to death and there was also an appeal against the sentence. We had found that this was a killing committed during the course of a felony and we could find no extenuating circumstances in this case. But counsel for the appellant had raised the issue that at the time that the offence was committed the appellant was a juvenile. We made an order that the appellant be medically examined to ascertain his age at the time that the offence was committed. We have since received the medical report and without going into the detailed findings of the doctor, the doctor's opinion is that at the time when the offence was committed the appellant was at least 18 years old. The appellant was J2 therefore not a juvenile but he was a juvenile adult. In the circumstances therefore we have no alternative but to confirm the sentence of death that was imposed on the appellant. The appeal against sentence is therefore dismissed as well. B. K. Bweupe DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE ’’D^’.'chirwa” SUPREME COURT JUDGE D. M. Uwanika SUPREME COURT JUDGE